Observation 281731: Polyporales sensu lato
When: 2017-07-08
No herbarium specimen

Notes: On a large beech log.

Images

756383
756384
758953
7/16/17
758954
7/16/17
758955
7/16/17
758956
7/16/17
758957
7/16/17
758958
7/16/17
758959
7/16/17
761800
Another piece pried away from the log, 7-20.
761801
Another piece pried away from the log, 7-20.

Proposed Names

47% (2)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight
-31% (2)
Recognized by sight
12% (2)
Recognized by sight
-40% (4)
Recognized by sight
31% (2)
Recognized by sight
31% (2)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Okay, Chaelthomas.
By: Dave W (Dave W)
2017-07-17 21:58:03 EDT (-0400)

The “flap” with the poroid underside seen in the photos is in my dryer. You may have this. I’ll need your mailing address.

Thanks for the offer.

You can
By: Chaelthomas (Chaelthomas)
2017-07-17 16:30:31 EDT (-0400)

Send these off my way with any information you have on them.
I can check them out in the scope and see whats going on.

I’d say Trichaptum makes about the most sense, so far.
By: Dave W (Dave W)
2017-07-17 16:19:26 EDT (-0400)

Fertile surface on the piece seen in several of the photos appears to be poroid with walls elongating irregularly and toothlike.

I got a thin white spore print and mounted in Congo red. Best photo I got wasn’t very clear. Maybe a dozen or so spores could be seen. They appeared to not have the cylindrical shape reported for species of Trichaptum, rather elliptical ~4.5-6 × 2.5-4. But this may be on account of these spores not being oriented to favor viewing in profile.

I’m sure I’ll visit this spot again within the next week. I know just where to find this old beech log. Maybe a little more growth will provide a clue.

Photos added…
By: Dave W (Dave W)
2017-07-16 21:25:59 EDT (-0400)

taken 7/16.

Context pliable but not rubbery/stretchable. Tough/resilient.

KOH instantly dark olive on shelf-like part.

Spores dropping, check tomorrow.

Second look… looks like a polypore.
By: Dave W (Dave W)
2017-07-16 18:31:16 EDT (-0400)

I didn’t think K. deusta was the correct ID here… just kinda “in the ballpark”. I believe I re-found this fruiting today. Visited the site (one of my favorite… shhhh… Bolets edulis spots). Still need to compare photos from then and now. I brought home some material, so… anybody interested? Actually, I’ve got a few other things destined for the dryer, so I’ll throw a piece of this in.

i see now
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2017-07-16 13:04:05 EDT (-0400)

that this is reflexed, so it is either a stereoid or something with very-small or not-yet-developed pores, like Gloeoporus. I’m leaning toward the latter. post more photos when it’s more mature?

Good question.
By: Dave W (Dave W)
2017-07-14 09:01:13 EDT (-0400)

No pores are visible anywhere in the photo. I guess I was thinking along the lines of something like Stereum. But I think this is likely incorrect. Maybe something closer to Kretzschmaria…?

pores where?
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2017-07-14 00:07:12 EDT (-0400)

Created: 2017-07-11 09:23:47 EDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2017-07-23 01:08:15 EDT (-0400)
Viewed: 159 times, last viewed: 2017-07-25 17:21:28 EDT (-0400)
Show Log