Introduction
How To Use
How To Help
Send a Comment

Index A->Z

Latest:
  Changes by Users
  Images
  Comments
  Features and Fixes

Observations:
  Create Observation
  Sort by Date

Species Lists:
  Create List
  Sort by Date
  Sort by Title

Account:
  Login
  Create Account

Contributors
Site Stats

Colors from Agaricus

Powered by:
Ruby on Rails
Preferred browser:
FireFox

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Find:
About Amanita alba sensu auct. calif. | Google Images | Distribution Map
Propose New Name | Add Comment | Manage Species Lists | Send Observer a Question
Observation: Amanita alba sensu auct. calif. (3101)

When: 2000-11-22
Collection location: Bolinas Ridge, Marin Co., California, USA [Click for map]
Who: Ron Pastorino (Ronpast)
No herbarium specimen

Notes: Thiers recognizes this species in his Agaricales of California, p16. With its rusty stains on the volva, it does also look like a white form of A. pachycolea.

Proposed Names:   Propose New Name

Proposed Name User Community Vote
Amanita alba sensu auct. calif.   Ronpast   (no votes)   Eyes

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye = Observer's choice Eyes = Current consensus

Comments:  Add Comment

Created: 2007-10-12 13:37:08
By: Nathan Wilson (nathan)
Summary: Made the author change

I’m not completely sure why Ron couldn’t make the change. I thought what I implemented was that the author could be changed by anyone if there were no associated observations. If there are associated observations and there is a user that owns all of those observations, then that user can change it. In any case the admin user can change it which is how I made the actual change. My sense is that the current restrictions are a bit too strong, but I’m not sure what would be a better plan. One solution would be to create different classes of users. I write a proposal up and send it out to the general list to see what people think.

Created: 2007-10-12 09:05:11
By: Ron Pastorino (Ronpast)
Summary: Agree on name change.

Tried to effect name change per Rod’s suggestion but was also rejected.

Created: 2007-10-12 08:06:34
By: Rod Tulloss (ret)
Summary: Amanita alba Gillet is not valid

Contrary to the information for this name, the name Amanita alba Gillet is not valid. It was originally used to apply to Amanita ovoidea. It has been generated by several authors since. Given the current status of knowledge of sect. Vaginatae in California, I have a problem with what name to give it. “Amanita alba sensu Thiers” certainly included white specimens of Amanita velosa…perhaps that is all it included. It would be necessary to go through all Thiers collections of “A. alba” in order to know. Maybe the best thing to do is call it “Amanita alba sensu auct. calif.” for the time being. Unfortunately, I was not able to enter the preferred name.

Created: 2007-09-22 19:23:37
By: Rod Tulloss (ret)
Summary: How many white species of section Vaginatae on the Pacific Coast?

I wonder how many white taxa are in the Pacific Coast collection of section Vaginatae? Can anyone distinguish more than one? In my brief collecting experiences (and later lab work), I think I found only white specimens of Amanita velosa. I’d certainly be interested in hearing about other white taxa of the Vaginatae. RET

Observation created: Thu Apr 19 19:57:08 -0700 2007
Last modified: Thu Apr 19 19:57:08 -0700 2007
Show Log

Images:

4364
Amanita alba sensu auct. calif. (4364)

6837
Amanita alba sensu auct. calif. (6837)