Introduction
How To Use
How To Help
Send a Comment

Index A->Z

Latest:
  Changes by Users
  Images
  Comments
  Features and Fixes

Observations:
  Create Observation
  Sort by Date

Species Lists:
  Create List
  Sort by Date
  Sort by Title

Account:
  Login
  Create Account

Contributors
Site Stats

Colors from Hygrocybe

Powered by:
Ruby on Rails
Preferred browser:
FireFox

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Find:
About Basidiomycetes sp. | Google Images | Distribution Map
Propose New Name | Add Comment | Manage Species Lists | Send Observer a Question
Prev | Next
Observation: Basidiomycetes sp. (7497)

When: 2008-05-13
Collection location: Mid North Coast Australia (Swans Crossing) [Click for map]
Who: Ian Dodd Kundabung NSW Australia (kundabungkid)
No herbarium specimen

Notes: I have an unidentified fungi.(Australian) The specimen was photographed on a live tree trunk between the trunk and breakaway bark. They (the fungi),were situated on the southern side (shaded) of the trunk about 5 feet above ground. They were in a group in various stages of growth. There were also some sacs of translucent liquid either on or between the fungi. There was no spore reading taken, no obvious aroma and the specimens were not disturbed.
The colour is accurate and photo was taken in natural light. The position of the fungi was between two tree trunks and therefore created a problem in photographing them on the correct plane. The photo’s were taken after torrential rain lasting a week. (10inches + )
One image although unsharp depicts the glutonous sac . The other image is sharp and unaltered.
This is the first time I have used this site and was referred by Clive Shirley, (Hidden Forest Fungi) N.Z. I have sent emails to several mycologists and Fungi sites without success. If you can help ID or provide an alternative referral address I would be most appreciative. I have an alternate email address, iedodd@bigpond.com. Many Thanks, (KK)

Proposed Names:   Propose New Name

Proposed Name User Community Vote
Tricholomopsis rutilans (Schaeff.) Singer   amanitarita    (4)  
Recognized by sight: Must show yellow on cap, stipe and gills to confirm ID.
Basidiomycetes sp.   nathan    (3)   Eyes
Recognized by sight
Tylopilus sp.   TomVolk    (1)  
Recognized by sight: My gestalt kind of tells me this may be a Tylopilus. or at least a bolete of some sort. How’s that for hedging?

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye = Observer's choice Eyes = Current consensus

Comments:  Add Comment

Created: 2008-06-08 15:03:40
By: Ian Dodd Kundabung NSW Australia (kundabungkid)
Summary: Identification.

In an attempt to correctly ID this fungi it is now in the hands of a qualified DNA tester in the USA Will have to wait for results that I will post immediately they are availble.

Created: 2008-05-22 13:38:27
By: Tom Volk (TomVolk)
Summary: Tylopilus?

Very interesting specimens. They sure look like the buttons of a Tylopilus or at least some bolete. But we will probably never know for sure. :(

Created: 2008-05-17 22:21:54
By: (CureCat)
Summary: .

It would be great if you could post a photo of a cross section of this fungi, if you still have it. If not, then thanks for the detailed description.

~CC

Created: 2008-05-16 06:22:41
By: Nathan Wilson (nathan)
Summary: Great conversation piece!

Several of us ended up talking about this observation at a recent meeting in Berkeley. They are pretty clearly primordia for a wood rotting basidio. The strongest suggestion was Tricholomopsis rutilans, but some thought it might well be a bolete of some sort. It’s great that you managed to get back to the site, but it looks like either it’s something even stranger or the primordia simply aborted.

Created: 2008-05-16 04:53:00
By: Ian Dodd Kundabung NSW Australia (kundabungkid)
Summary: Email contents to Katrina "Fungimap to Fungi Australia. (contains extra details)

Dear Katrina,
I have been given your contact information arising from my attempts to have an Australian (Mid North East Coast) Fungi Identified. (Dorothy Beebee (dbeebee@sonic.net))

It has been an exhausting experience to say the least. I have and still do, talk with several Mycologists, who are always very willing to be of help.

Unfortunately they do not reside in Australia. This does create a problem sometimes with native fungi that I photograph, and require identification..

I find that it is very difficult to get much help within our own country, except from fellow photographers, and semi professional people interested in identifying fungi, and a couple of Forestry Rangers with whom I have made friendships.

I have spoken by email with Clive Shirley on quite a few occasions, with a great deal of success, and also exchanged shots of interesting species. I also have his Hidden Forest Fungi booklet. He has been unable to help in this instance.

I have also been in touch with David Ellis, who wont be available till Monday the 19th.

Brian Perry and Professor Dennis Desjarden, (SanFrancisco University) have been able to identify species for me in the past, but I am still waiting for them to get back to me on this one.

This last Fungi I have had trouble identifying remains unidentified to this moment. ( I have visited every site imaginable and spent hours searching through thousands of images.)

When I first photographed it, I did not realise that it was going to be so hard to put a name to it. I did not disturb the fungi, although I did try to see if there was any distinctive aroma. I also took the photo in natural light.

Some of the fungi photographed did have small globules of some translucent liquid attached to them, and the red caps did appear to be moist and shiny in appearance. I did not try to see if the liquid was sticky.

The fungi were growing on the sheltered side of the tree, and there was a good range of varying growth in the observed fungi group. We had just received over 10inches of rain.

All had the same colour characteristics, although there were only two that I would describe as what I thought were full grown. (see images.)

After receiving several references from members of the Mushroom observers, who I do appreciate their efforts, I cannot get an identification that I agree with.
. ...........

In desperation I returned to the site, (a full days trip), and re-photographed the specimen. ( I really didn’t expect to see anything remaining)

I then removed one from its habitat, (between broken bark and tree trunk,) and split it in two halves (top to bottom.) I also, after checking it out for colour and any other noticeable effects, rubbed it between my fingers to see if there was any smell. There was some colour change inside the main body, slightly pinkish but nothing contrasty. (Mainly grey.)

The results were pretty bland. The fungi had lost its original red cap\ white body, and taken on a brownish appearance, and the texture of the cap and stem felt dried out and was in my opinion the case.

The two remaining fungi that I described as being the largest were the only ones remaining when I returned. All the others had disappeared surprisingly!

The moisture content of the tree and its bark had changed considerably from the time of my first observation and photograph. ( Very much dryer)
The fungi were located at about head height, (5ft) {I’m a shorty}.
There was approximately three weeks between the first photo and the last today. 27/04/08 & 15/05/08

When I presented the first photo I did not give the fungi measurements. I will attach the original of two taken in the first instance, and then again today. Because of the position of the fungi, (between two trees,) the distance between lens plane and image are very very similar.

Katria,

I normally shoot macro at 1:1 ratio. I have determined image size and distance from the lens, to be the same in all shots ,with resolution being the same overall in each image. This should provide a reasonable comparison in the loss of size in the second set (last lot _DSD1554/1555) of images.

From what has already been discussed, the impression I get is that the specimens are of a woody group. The Identification from the Mushroom observers points to this, but I do not agree with their naming. (Tricholomopsis rutilans) I have compared all the site images and nothing matches. The cap of the fungi is still intact as a ball and this definitely doesn’t match Tricholomopsis rutilans.

The fungi I believe has lost at least about a third of its original size, (probably due to dehydration). The fact that it is still similar in shape rather makes me feel inclined to the WOODY description, but this is where the identification then is open to debate I hope I haven’t bored you with the details of the description, but would really like to have the Fungi identified, and if this is not possible with you, maybe you could fwd my information on to someone you think can help me out of my misery.

I have kept one specimen in a sealed bag, in the fridge, and will only be too happy to make it available for identification if the need be.

Many Thanks & Appreciation,
Ian Dodd (KK) iedodd@bigpond.com
kundabungkid@kundabung.com.au

Created: 2008-05-14 10:31:44
By: debbie viess (amanitarita)
Summary: Could be a Tricholomopsis rutilans

They do occur in Australia, they’re woodrotters, and they do have the densely hairy, rose-colored caps. I couldn’t find any other good photos of primordia, but Kuo has a photo on his T. rutilans page that is a fairly close match:
http://www.mushroomexpert.com/tricholomopsis_rutilans.html

If it is this mushroom, it should have yellow context and gills. Go back and solve this mystery for us all, Ian!!!

Created: 2008-05-14 08:52:39
By: Dimitar Bojantchev (dimitar)
Summary: Tricholomopsis sp.

Looks like some kind of Tricholomopsis. Probably an aborted form of Tricholomopsis rutilans. If sqeezed by the bark and trunk…

D.

Created: 2008-05-14 08:36:30
By: Dorothy Beebee (dbeebee)
Summary: Referral to Australian mycologists

Have you contacted the folks who are involved with the “Fungimap to Australian Fungi”? Try contacting Katrina Syme ( syme@westnet.com.au ) in W.A. for a referral.As a botanical illustrator, she has been actively working on the project for a number of years, and may be able to give you the names of some mycologists to help you. I remember that mycologist Richard Robinson was immensely helpful when we had our International Fungi & Fibre Symposium in Denmark, W.A. several years ago.

Created: 2008-05-14 07:34:26
By: debbie viess (amanitarita)
Summary: Wow!

Amazing color and texture on that rose-pink cap! I’m with Nathan…without a mature specimen (and maybe even then!) an ID is probably hopeless. Way too fluff-textured on that cap to be a Calostoma, altho the pink color works. ;)
Not sure what your glutinous sacs indicate, and really couldn’t see any detail in that blurry photo. Go back and reshoot (and collect and dry) if you can.

How big were they, anyway?

Created: 2008-05-13 21:09:43
By: Nathan Wilson (nathan)
Summary: Cool fungus!

I would guess it’s a Basidiomycete, but that’s not saying much and I’m not even sure it’s true. They are definitely young, so it would be great to see how they develop over time if you get a chance to return to spot over the next few days. I’ve never seen anything quite like it, but as a wild guess it might be related to the genus Calostoma.

Created: 2008-05-13 17:52:34
By: (Alan Rockefeller)
Summary: Ask Clive

I was going to recommend that you ask Clive Shirley until I read that he is the one who sent you here.

Observation created: Tue May 13 16:06:19 -0700 2008
Last modified: Tue May 13 16:09:25 -0700 2008
Show Log

Images:

13304
Basidiomycetes sp. (13304)

13388
Basidiomycetes sp. (13388)

13389
Basidiomycetes sp. (13389)

13390
Basidiomycetes sp. (13390)

13391
Basidiomycetes sp. (13391)

13392
Basidiomycetes sp. (13392)

13393
Basidiomycetes sp. (13393)