Observation 89359: Phaeophyscia Moberg
When: 2011-05-11
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

86% (1)
Eye3 5c6eddec590837031337afa65c6dae3ed8064bcb49913610a8e8567612a7f4e4 Eyes3 f2fd2c9d8b69e743ac1ff2cb38c5633900ff9ac4c4a7c047078b9f1769373936
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 5c6eddec590837031337afa65c6dae3ed8064bcb49913610a8e8567612a7f4e4 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 f2fd2c9d8b69e743ac1ff2cb38c5633900ff9ac4c4a7c047078b9f1769373936 = Current consensus


Add Comment
CNALH Lichens of WI
By: Chris Parrish (kitparrish)
2012-03-15 14:17:48 CST (-0500)

I noticed some new developments at CNALH … lichen flora projects for several new states, including a checklist of the Lichens of WI by Bennett, with 735 species at this point. If you ever need a rainy day project, you might think of making an MO style “species list” of your tremendous series on the lichens of WI.

I was recently admiring the Australian lichen checklist, but was startled to see that almost all of the photos were taken by just a few investigators. There is much to be said for an MO-style effort which is open to all interested contributors and is complementary to the work of the professionals.

Could it be a fertile P. pusilloides?
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2012-03-15 01:02:59 CST (-0500)
I like this photo, too bad I didn’t take that sample…
By: Andrew Khitsun (Andrew)
2012-03-14 19:58:21 CST (-0500)

Created: 2012-03-14 19:56:25 CST (-0500)
Last modified: 2012-03-14 19:57:11 CST (-0500)
Viewed: 76 times, last viewed: 2016-05-05 21:38:54 CDT (-0400)
Show Log