Name: Agaricus silvaticus Schaeff.
Most Confident Observations:
677957
Copyright © 2016 Eva Skific (Evica)
674077
Copyright © 2016 Eva Skific (Evica)
671469
Copyright © 2016 Eva Skific (Evica)
389121
Copyright © 2013 Eva Skific (Evica)
Version: 6
Previous Version 


First person to use this name on MO: Nathan Wilson
Editors: walt sturgeon, Erlon, I. G. Safonov, zaca

Nomenclature:
Classification:

Domain: Eukarya

Kingdom: Fungi

Phylum: Basidiomycota

Class: Agaricomycetes

Order: Agaricales

Family: Agaricaceae

Genus: Agaricus

Show Varieties

Notes on Taxonomy: [Edit]

It appears that this species was published as Agaricus sylvaticus but then amended to Agaricus silvaticus as per Myco Bank.

http://www.mycobank.org/...

Current name: Agaricus silvaticus Schaeff., Fungorum qui in Bavaria et Palatinatu circa Ratisbonam nascuntur Icones 4: 62, t. 242 (1774) [MB#244265]
Classification: Fungi, Basidiomycota, Agaricomycotina, Agaricomycetes, Agaricomycetidae, Agaricales, Agaricaceae, Agaricus

Descriptions: [Create]

Comments

Add Comment
Again
By: zaca
2014-03-12 06:27:11 WIB (+0700)

“There can be only one validly published name.”
In that case there is no other choice, the original Agaricus sylvaticus the one that is recognized by Species Fungorum.

“I don’t believe Agaricus sylvaticus was conserved by Fries.”
The question is not what you believe, but the name that some entity recognized determines.

Only one
By: Erlon (Herbert Baker)
2014-03-12 06:17:18 WIB (+0700)

There can be only one validly published name. I don’t believe Agaricus sylvaticus was conserved by Fries. ‘Agaricus silvaticus Schaeff. apud L. Secretan, (1833) page 176 [basionym]’ http://www.cybertruffle.org.uk/cybernome/eng/

OK! Good to know.
By: zaca
2014-03-12 05:45:56 WIB (+0700)

He have then two names: One going back to 1774 and other to 1887 that seem to coexist till now. Therefore, it makes no sense to deprecate one in favour of the other, especially if someone deprecate the original. I think that they can live as synonyms.

Cybernome
By: Erlon (Herbert Baker)
2014-03-12 05:28:08 WIB (+0700)

…is a great resource for information. Here’s the latin description for A. silvaticus http://www.cybertruffle.org.uk/cyberliber/05438/1000.htm

But this opens the possibility …
By: zaca
2014-03-12 05:05:35 WIB (+0700)

… of anyone arrange, by mistake, by chance or deliberately, its orthographic variant of any name. After all, to whom do you recognize the final word in terms of nomenclature? Can you indicate any scientific paper where the name A. silvaticus appear without mention to the orginal name?

Accepted
By: Erlon (Herbert Baker)
2014-03-12 04:04:52 WIB (+0700)

Agaricus sylvaticus is an orthographic variant. Index Fungorum is not the final word when it comes to nomenclature nor are they always up to date with changes.

Deprecated
By: zaca
2014-03-11 22:16:14 WIB (+0700)

The name “Agaricus silvaticus” does not exist in Species Fungorum; The Current name is:
Current Name:
Agaricus sylvaticus Schaeff., Fung. bavar. palat. nasc. (Ratisbonae) 4: 62 (1774)

Created: 2007-06-19 12:53:25 WIB (+0700) by Nathan Wilson (nathan)
Last modified: 2016-06-09 02:03:35 WIB (+0700) by I. G. Safonov (IGSafonov)
Viewed: 710 times, last viewed: 2018-06-12 23:59:06 WIB (+0700)
Show Log