2012 Wrapup and Request for Support
Introduction
How To Use
How To Help
Donate
Feature Tracker
Send a Comment

Index A→Z
List Locations
List Projects

Latest:
 Changes by Users
 Images
 Comments
 Features and Fixes

Observations:
 Create Observation
 Sort by Date

Species Lists:
 Create List
 Sort by Date
 Sort by Title

Account:
 Login
 Create Account

Languages:
 Deutsch
 Ελληνικά
 English
 Español
 Français
 Polski
 Português
 Русский

Contributors
Site Stats
Translator’s Note

Colors from Black on White

Powered by:
Ruby on Rails
Preferred browser:
FireFox

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Name: Lichen P. Micheli

Most Confident Observations

286056

203871

200719

140654


More Observations
More Observations (all synonyms)
Similar Observations
Nomenclature:
Rank: Phylum
Status: Accepted
Name: Lichen
Author: P. Micheli
Citation: Nova plantarum genera (Florentiae): 73 (1729)
Deprecated Synonym(s): Lichens, Sun Baked Crust

Classification: Edit

Brief Description: See More | Edit

This is a “fake” taxon meant to group all lichenized fungi. Most belong in Ascomycota, but there are a few in Basidiomycota, and there are several distinct lineages even within Ascomycota due to the lichenized condition apparently evolving independently several times. (There is some debate on this matter still, as one leading lichenologist claims that all existing ascomycetes share a lichenized ancestor! (Does anyone have a citation for this?))

In general, a lichen is any fungus that grows with a green alga and/or cyanobacteria, where the relationship is obligate (at least for the fungus), and the resulting symbiosis results in a specialized thallus which neither the fungus nor the alga/cyanobacteria would produce on their own.

See the section on Terminology below for an overview of lichen morphology.


Descriptions: Create

Version: 4
Previous Version: 3

First person to use this name on MO: John Harlan
Editors: Jason Hollinger, Tim Sage

Comments: Add Comment

Created: 2011-01-22 14:22:59 EST (-0500)
By: Patrick Harvey (pg_harvey)
Summary: Noah said:

> Our mushroom books don’t have lichens in them …

Ah, but our lichens DO have fungi in them!

— Feral Boy

302228

Created: 2010-04-09 23:46:47 EDT (-0400)
By: Noah Siegel (Amanita virosa)
Summary: Bitter, hah.

mycologists can study their subject year round, you just have to travel (though it has been 69 days since I have seen a fleshy mushroom, only 9 more days…)

Problem with the mushroom guides? no way, they are mushroom guides not lichen guides. That being said it is strange to have slime molds included in some of them.

It would be nice to live my life in blissful ignorance of lichenized fungi (okay so I occasionally look at lichens, I just don’t want to see them on mushroom sites)
So please give people like me a filter.

89114

Created: 2010-04-09 15:43:15 EDT (-0400)
By: Johannes Harnisch (Johann)
Summary: Hey I just noticed

this description below contains all of every thing you would get in a field guide! (or almost)Thanks Jason !

82632

Created: 2010-04-09 11:11:47 EDT (-0400)
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
Summary: just saw this page…

and I would like to say that it is a GREAT synopsis of lichen description, ID and morphology. very useful to those of us who know next to nothing about this interesting group.
altho the fleshy fungi are my passion, I enjoy seeing the diverse lichen forms as well, esp. when more knowledgeable folks than I can actually put some names to them! and who the heck doesn’t like a weird slimemold? What the hey, life is a never ending series of TMI, just filter out what you don’t want to see…that’s what our brains and delete buttons are for!

230644

Created: 2010-04-09 10:45:55 EDT (-0400)
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
Summary: Awww, he’s just bitter…

…because mycologists can’t study their subjects throughout the year like we can. It’s understandable. Lichen-envy.

I submit that the problem lies with your mushroom guides, Noah, not MO!

But seriously, Nathan and you are both right. I would like to give users the ability to “turn on” and “turn off” various groups of fungi. Maybe a popup menu hidden under the “Mushroom Observer” banner? I’ve more than once wanted to filter out all those pesky macrofungi, and occasionally even want to see just the slimemolds… organisms, I can’t help but point out, which are even more distantly related to your macrofungi than lichens!

“Slime Observer” anyone?

52178

Created: 2010-04-09 07:57:29 EDT (-0400)
By: Nathan Wilson (nathan)
Summary: Lichens are here to stay

There have been requests to not support Lichens on Mushroom Observer. However, from the Introduction: “This site takes a very broad view. While the emphasis is on the large fleshy fungi, other fungi such as lichens, rust and molds as well as fungus-like organisms such as slime-molds are all welcome.”

That said, we are looking into providing filters so users can focus on what they care about. As it turns out Jason has already gone a long way down the path of identifying which taxa he considers Lichens and enabling functionality so that he gets notified when lichen observations get entered. I expect we could adapt this work to provide the reverse filter so those who want to can look at Mushroom Observer blissfully unaware of the fascinating world of Lichens that are also getting supported by the site.

301981

Created: 2010-04-08 21:39:36 EDT (-0400)
By: Johannes Harnisch (Johann)
Summary: Sounds good!

I just about filled the changes page with Lichens,
how about a separate changes page for lichens

82632

Created: 2010-04-08 19:43:31 EDT (-0400)
By: Noah Siegel (Amanita virosa)
Summary: I can’t take it anymore

Jason and Nathan please make a Lichen Observer and get them off MUSHROOM observer.
Our mushroom books don’t have lichens in them so why should our mushroom websites.

89114



Created: 2008-04-21 17:32:32 EDT (-0400) by John Harlan (harlanx6)
Last modified: 2012-06-28 02:03:28 EDT (-0400) by Tim Sage (T. Sage)
Viewed: 2575 times, last viewed: 2013-05-25 19:31:46 EDT (-0400)
Show Log