2011 Wrap-Up for Mushroom Observer
Introduction
How To Use
How To Help
Donate
Feature Tracker
Send a Comment

Index A→Z
List Locations
List Projects

Latest:
 Changes by Users
 Images
 Comments
 Features and Fixes

Observations:
 Create Observation
 Sort by Date

Species Lists:
 Create List
 Sort by Date
 Sort by Title

Account:
 Login
 Create Account

Languages:
 Deutsch
 Ελληνικά
 English
 Español
 Français
 Polski
 Português
 Русский

Contributors
Site Stats
Translator’s Note

Colors from Black on White

Powered by:
Ruby on Rails
Preferred browser:
FireFox

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Observation: Amanita nothofagi G. Stev. (31746)
About Amanita nothofagi G. Stev.
Public Description (default) [Edit]
When: 2010-01-04
Collection location: Kaipara harbour, Auckland, New Zealand [Click for map]
Who: Michael W (michael w)
No herbarium specimen
Proposed Names: Propose Another Name
Proposed Name User Community Vote
  michael w   62% (3)   Eye3Eyes3
Recognized by sight
  michael w   5% (3)   Eye3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice Eyes3 = Current consensus
Comments: Add Comment

Created: 2010-01-10 14:42:21 WET (+0000)
By: ret
Summary: Good photos!

Michael, I got to this page a few minutes back and saw A. karea as the proposed name, switched tabs to take a look at my notes on karea, decided to look at your spore photo and just got back in time to see you switch the naming back to A. nothofagi. (It’s terrible that I’ve never seen these species myself. I wonderful if I’ll ever get to NZ.) I so much appreciate your posts! And the occasional dried specimens sent from NZ! As you yourself must have noted, the spores were not appropriate to A. karea and the annulus of A. karea is described as white, sometimes with a sordid edge. I just added a new link from the new Amanita Studies website (now hidden and under contruction) to this observation. As always, I want to make sure whether or not the “no herbarium specimen” label on this observation is correct or not. After seeing your spore picture, I wonder if it might not be worthwhile to sample spores of several collection of A. nothofagi to see if the average Q isn’t a little bit higher than one might have projected from the original description…one of those little details in which I am interested.

R.



Created: 2010-01-10 12:13:32 WET (+0000)
Last modified: 2010-01-10 12:13:32 WET (+0000)
Viewed: 37 times, last viewed: 2011-08-28 23:57:33 WET (+0000)
Show Log

Images: (large thumbnails)

73511

73512

73513

73514
Spores, 8.5×7.25 µm, Q=1.17. Scale divisions=2.5 µm.