NEW FEATURES! Read about them here: May 7th releases and May 18th releases
Introduction
How To Use
How To Help
Donate
Feature Tracker
Send a Comment

Index A→Z
List Locations
List Projects

Latest:
 Changes by Users
 Images
 Comments
 Features and Fixes

Observations:
 Create Observation
 Sort by Date

Species Lists:
 Create List
 Sort by Date
 Sort by Title

Account:
 Login
 Create Account

Languages:
 Deutsch
 Ελληνικά
 English
 Español
 Français
 Polski
 Português
 Русский

Contributors
Site Stats
Translator’s Note

Colors from Black on White

Powered by:
Ruby on Rails
Preferred browser:
FireFox

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Observation: Cladonia sp. (47312)
About Cladonia
When: 2010-06-14
Collection location: La Ronge, Saskatchewan, Canada [Click for map]
Who: Robert Sasata (Sasata)
No herbarium specimen

Notes: Cladonia macilenta?

Proposed Names: Propose Another Name
Proposed Name User Community Vote
  Sasata   82% (1)   Eye3Eyes3
Recognized by sight
  jason   28% (1)  
Recognized by sight
  jason   28% (1)  
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice Eyes3 = Current consensus
Comments: Add Comment

Created: 2010-06-22 19:49:44 WET (+0000)
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
Summary: it’s a handome thing isn’t it?

Very nice photo, by the way. But a super-macro or dissecting-scope shot might clear up confusion.

52178

Created: 2010-06-22 19:43:09 WET (+0000)
By: Robert Sasata (Sasata)
Summary: Thanks

much for your analysis of this observation. I will examine the species more closely next time I’m in the area, and perhaps try to get some better macro shots. I see this lichen all the time, and would really like to know what it is.


Created: 2010-06-22 18:39:15 WET (+0000)
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
Summary: tricky

There are quite a few boreal cupped Cladonia with red apothecia:

C. sulphurina
C. deformis
C. digitata
C. borealis
C. pleurota
C. coccifera

I can’t quite tell if there is any soredia among the granules on the cups of yours. They are certainly not “finely sorediate”, and the cups certainly are not badly deformed, so that rules out all but C. pleurota (granular sorediate), and C. borealis and C. coccifera (corticate). The granules on C. borealis would be more like scales than lumps, so I’d say that was out, too. Only way to get a positive ID is to check very closely for the presence of any soft/cottony soredia among the granules. C. coccifera shouldn’t have any, but C. pleurota will always have some. Otherwise, chemistry is the same and morphology overlaps. Both are expected to be common up there.

52178


Created: 2010-06-22 04:03:00 WET (+0000)
Last modified: 2010-06-22 18:27:04 WET (+0000)
Viewed: 49 times, last viewed: 2012-03-26 20:11:08 WET (+0000)
Show Log