2011 Wrap-Up for Mushroom Observer
Introduction
How To Use
How To Help
Donate
Feature Tracker
Send a Comment

Index A→Z
List Locations
List Projects

Latest:
 Changes by Users
 Images
 Comments
 Features and Fixes

Observations:
 Create Observation
 Sort by Date

Species Lists:
 Create List
 Sort by Date
 Sort by Title

Account:
 Login
 Create Account

Languages:
 Deutsch
 Ελληνικά
 English
 Español
 Français
 Polski
 Português
 Русский

Contributors
Site Stats
Translator’s Note

Colors from Black on White

Powered by:
Ruby on Rails
Preferred browser:
FireFox

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Observation: Amanita subcokeri Tulloss nom. prov. (8575)
About Amanita subcokeri Tulloss nom. prov.
When: 2008-07-16
Collection location: Boone, North Carolina, USA [Click for map]
Who: debbie viess (amanitarita)
No herbarium specimen
Proposed Names: Propose Another Name
Proposed Name User Community Vote
  amanitarita   -30% (2)  
Recognized by sight
Used references: Jenkins, RET.
  ret   80% (1)   Eyes3
Recognized by sight: I’m pretty certain that this is what I haved called “species 5.” Pinkish staining is not a character of A. cokeri (see pic 16104); however it IS a character of the look-alike “sp. 5 (RET).” This species has smaller warts that are not as easily removed by weather as those of A. cokeri. It is often smaller than A. cokeri. Its spores are distinctly narrower than those of A. cokeri. It often has a strong odor that (to RET) smells like a mixture of cedarchest and burnt sugar; on the other hand, cokeri is odorless until it has aged quite a bit (then the odor is very unpleasant). The recurved scales of the bulb are very like those of A. cokeri as are the fibrils connecting the underside of the annulus to the stipe. Both species will occasionally have an individual fruiting body with a double annulus (2 annuli often joined at their margins). For example, see the New Jersey Pine Barrens checklist/picture book on the Amanita Studies site. R.
Used references: Amanita studies website

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice Eyes3 = Current consensus
Comments: Add Comment

Created: 2008-07-31 15:49:28 WEST (+0100)
By: ret
Summary: Good going, Debbie.

Back at the turn of the 20th Century, a certain Mrs. Williams wrote a few articles about Amanita for the Asa Gray Journal. In one of the articles she lamented that every year it was necessary to learn the “big white” amanitas (lepidellas) over again. They were so hard to keep straight. I say, “Yo, Mrs. Williams!”


Created: 2008-07-31 15:44:16 WEST (+0100)
By: debbie viess (amanitarita)
Summary: Amanita species 5 kept popping up…

…but these were not kept long enough for the distinctive cedar/brown sugar odor to arise. We did run into several Species (like Chanel) Number 5 at Highlands, and kept having to revise our cokeri names! Thanks for the further clues. Damn these difficult lepidellas anyway! I am struggling up that learning curve…

139559


Created: 2008-07-31 00:06:12 WEST (+0100)
Last modified: 2008-07-31 00:16:04 WEST (+0100)
Viewed: 20 times, last viewed: 2011-02-06 12:07:18 WET (+0000)