Observation 107294: Lichen P. Micheli
When: 2012-08-15
Who: zaca
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

29% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
Yes, but makes Fulgensia look better!
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2012-08-28 01:13:38 CEST (+0200)
On soil!
By: zaca
2012-08-28 01:00:40 CEST (+0200)

That seems to rule out C. phlogina that grows on bark.

C. phlogina looks promising.
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2012-08-28 00:57:38 CEST (+0200)

Is this on bark or rock?

Yes, that’s my thought
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2012-08-28 00:55:53 CEST (+0200)

[Sorry, I’m a few comments behind!]

It has a similar texture to Fulgensia, but it looks crustose, so it’s probably not, I guess. Some Fulgensia have septate spores, but the septum is not thickened like in Caloplaca.

Can this be
By: zaca
2012-08-28 00:54:46 CEST (+0200)
The thallus …
By: zaca
2012-08-28 00:51:43 CEST (+0200)

seems to be closer to Fulgensia than to Caloplaca. Other intriguing point concerns the pieces of thallus under and on the margins of apothecia.

Candelariella is K-, so is out.
By: zaca
2012-08-28 00:40:51 CEST (+0200)
Why not Candelariella?
By: zaca
2012-08-28 00:36:15 CEST (+0200)
Deciding between Caloplaca and Fulgensia?
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2012-08-28 00:27:36 CEST (+0200)

Created: 2012-08-28 00:10:31 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2012-08-28 00:10:31 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 30 times, last viewed: 2014-09-16 02:50:02 CEST (+0200)
Show Log