Observation 108319: Agaricales sensu lato
When: 2012-09-02
No herbarium specimen

Notes: slimy, base unextractable

Proposed Names

-46% (2)
Recognized by sight: with pine
-34% (5)
Eye3
Recognized by sight: maybe Hebeloma, Pholiota, etc
16% (3)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Alain, please stop
By: Alan Rockefeller (Alan Rockefeller)
2016-06-05 14:55:12 CDT (-0400)

It is not helpful to post the same incoherent comment on lots of old observations. I also don’t understand why you prefer Agaricales Underw. to Agaricales sensu lato.

Google translate to French:

Alain, s’il vous plaît arrêter. Il est utile de poster le même commentaire incohérente sur beaucoup de vieilles observations. Je ne comprends pas pourquoi vous préférez Agaricales Underw. à Agaricales sensu lato.

AGARICALES UNDERW. IS A TRUE TAXON. THIS OBS SEEM IDENTIFIABLE
By: GALL Alain (GALLA-TAHITI)
2016-06-04 20:35:48 CDT (-0400)

SEE THE OTHERS WITH ONE CLIC.
http://mushroomobserver.org/comment/comment_search?pattern=AGARICALES+UNDERW.+IS+A+TRUE+TAXON.+THIS+OBS+SEEM+IDENTIFIABLE.
Agaricales sensu lato AS BEEN CREATED BY MYXOMOP.
SEE HIS COMMENT ON. http://mushroomobserver.org/name/show_name/31029?q=2mGEk
ACTUALLY.
Agaricales sensu lato 3781 OBS = 252 pages
BUT
Agaricales Underw. 1 OBS = LESS THAN 1 pages
CHANGE THIS SYSTEM FOR AMELIORATE MO.
HELP US FOR IDENTIFICATION.

whoa
By: Dmitriy Bochkov (convallaria)
2012-09-03 12:52:07 CDT (-0400)

didn’t notice that the gills are decurrent-ish…

The gills
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2012-09-03 12:35:13 CDT (-0400)

don’t look right for Limacella..
Maybe you should check the spore colour to start with.

Created: 2012-09-03 10:28:26 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2016-06-05 14:56:48 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 92 times, last viewed: 2016-11-09 13:37:22 CST (-0500)
Show Log