Observation 108724: Strobilomyces Berk.
When: 2012-09-05
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

84% (1)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight: Advanced microscopy is necessary to ID to species.

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Advanced microscopy?
By: Daniel B. Wheeler (Tuberale)
2012-09-06 00:08:46 CEST (+0200)

I don’t think this deserves that much skill. According to Smith, Smith & Weber in How to Know the Non-Gilled Mushrooms, S. floccopus has spores 9.5-15 X 8.5-12 microns vs. S. confusus, which has spores 10.5-12.5 X 9.7-10.2 microns. Of course, if talking about all the more recent species, lots of additional microscopy can assist, even electron microscopy. Even with today’s microminiaturization, EM’s still difficult to get lug into the field.

Failing an EM in the back pocket, the cap scales of S. floccopus are “large soft somewhat appressed”; and S. confusus scales are “acute, thin, rigid, erect spines or squamules…”

This looks to me more like S. floccopus, which probably is the most common Strobilomyces around, too.

Created: 2012-09-05 20:21:51 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2012-09-05 20:36:32 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 25 times, last viewed: 2016-10-22 04:34:39 CEST (+0200)
Show Log