Observation 109726: Amanita “sp-T31”
When: 2012-09-15
Herbarium specimen reported

Notes: Under the same tree as observation: www.mushroomobserver.org/71255

Proposed Names

65% (2)
Eye3
Recognized by sight
ret
81% (1)
Eyes3
Based on chemical features: This is one of the collections that was use to create the concept of sp-T31.

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Hello, Stephen.
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2015-08-06 21:38:25 PDT (-0700)

I’m in overload mode at the moment; so I’ll beg off until I get this all sorted.

Very best,

Rod

Any known macroscopic differences
By: Stephen Russell (Mycota)
2015-08-06 20:18:06 PDT (-0700)

between this and sp-W15?

That is precisely the plan.
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2012-09-16 17:19:00 PDT (-0700)

If you take a look at one of the species with GenBank links on the techtab on WAO (e.g., Amanita pruittii), you’ll see that the information about the collection sequenced is spelled out. In future, the MO observation number will be positioned immediately after the collector’s name and collection number (if there is one). This will be organized exactly as MO observation numbers are used in “material examined” data fields now.

Very best,

Rod

I assumed so…
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2012-09-16 16:01:10 PDT (-0700)

but once confirmed, we can hopefully all learn how to do it.

Agreed
By: Erlon (Herbert Baker)
2012-09-16 13:38:00 PDT (-0700)

..and please include MO observation numbers to corresponding genetic work so we can examine macro characteristics ourselves.

Thank you,
’erb

Debbie.
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2012-09-16 13:36:41 PDT (-0700)

Deb,

Macroscopic differences are already sufficient to raise concern about the identity of this mushroom. That’s why I’m interested in the microscopy…and the genetics. This may already be something that is known by a code name.

R

once we can clearly determine a difference genetically…
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2012-09-16 12:36:05 PDT (-0700)

then we can look for the differences that undoubtedly also exist macroscopically (and of course, microscopically too. you are already an ace at this, Rod.).

good to know that we have so many interesting members of section caesarea here in NA.

You should get more
By: Patrick Harvey (pg_harvey)
2012-09-16 11:27:16 PDT (-0700)

I’ve encouraged a MOMS member who lives down south in Poplar Bluff to
send you some that he found this week. Also found out that a friend
in a club in Indiana will be sending you a sample of a Limacella.

— Patrick

Thank you, Patrick.
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2012-09-16 11:22:51 PDT (-0700)

I hope I get a bunch of these this year.

R

Deb,…
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2012-09-16 11:21:42 PDT (-0700)

that’s pretty much the case with everything now. I agree.

r

It’s in the dryer
By: Patrick Harvey (pg_harvey)
2012-09-16 11:17:40 PDT (-0700)

so you’ll be able to determine what it is & let us know

Thanks,
Patrick

maybe it should get added to the DNA pile?
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2012-09-16 08:42:36 PDT (-0700)
Again, I don’t think this is jacksonii. It seems to be all over the SE U.S….
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2012-09-16 06:57:58 PDT (-0700)

this year.

Rod

Created: 2012-09-15 16:37:36 PDT (-0700)
Last modified: 2015-08-09 04:47:48 PDT (-0700)
Viewed: 134 times, last viewed: 2016-11-23 15:09:25 PST (-0800)
Show Log