Observation 123181: Chlorociboria aeruginascens (Nyl.) Kanouse ex C.S. Ramamurthi, Korf & L.R. Batra
When: 2013-01-20
No herbarium specimen

Notes: Brought into the ID table at SOMA Camp.

Proposed Names

87% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Based on microscopic features: Spores 5 – 8 × 1 – 2, crescent shaped

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
not from those few collections…
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2016-06-28 04:42:24 CEST (+0200)
Checking GenBank sequences
By: Alan Rockefeller (Alan Rockefeller)
2016-06-28 00:03:56 CEST (+0200)

I don’t see any evidence that there are multiple species hiding under the names C. aeruginascens or C. aeruginosa.

A quick tree I just made: http://images.mushroomobserver.org/chloro.jpg

then there’s this:
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2016-06-27 22:01:56 CEST (+0200)


which describes 13 new species and one new subspecies. New Zealand’s hyperdiversity notwithstanding, I think it’s safe to assume that the genus is much more complicated and much less binary (ie: aeruginascens vs. aeruginosa) than previously thought.

so here is
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2016-06-27 21:33:00 CEST (+0200)

a confirmed C. aeruginascens… with a centrally-stipitate apothecium that whitens/lightens as it ages/dries. if the Wikipedia spore ranges of each spp. are to be trusted (they are uncited), there is overlap there as well. presence/absence of encrustation on ectal excipular hyphae appears to be the most diagnostic feature, but no observation on the site as of the time of writing (June 2016) shows them in a micrograph or drawing.

awesome thumbnail
By: Britney Ramsey (Riverdweller)
2013-02-04 22:33:01 CET (+0100)

I stole it for my desktop :)

Created: 2013-01-23 06:45:28 CET (+0100)
Last modified: 2013-01-23 06:45:36 CET (+0100)
Viewed: 184 times, last viewed: 2016-10-24 09:29:11 CEST (+0200)
Show Log