|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||6.39||1||(Gerhard)|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
No, I’m just referring to the fact (at least IMO) that not all changes made due to DNA analyses are the non plus ultra now. Sound doubts are … ehm, sound I guess. I think in some decades they will overthrow everything again when they use other primers, other sequences or simply something “completely new”. Technology is not always a benefit but also often a curse. But that’s just my opinion.
a DNA criminal?
Someone who claims DNA evidence without presenting it..?
them DNA criminals and writing desk taxonomists ;)
that you are using the name persistens and not acutoconica like so many european authors..
Created: 2013-02-02 03:33:55 PST (-0800)
Last modified: 2013-02-02 03:34:03 PST (-0800)
Viewed: 45 times, last viewed: 2016-10-24 00:43:26 PDT (-0700)