Observation 129525: Gomphidius roseus (Fr.) Fr.

Proposed Names

86% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight
84% (1)
Recognized by sight: Mixed collection.

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
By: Erlon (Herbert Baker)
2013-02-26 14:53:30 EST (-0500)

That would defeat the purpose of the search feature. Why not just add the name separately?

So then I would like to propose
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2013-02-26 14:44:18 EST (-0500)

to change that if it was possible.

You cannot
By: Erlon (Herbert Baker)
2013-02-26 14:37:48 EST (-0500)

You must add the other species separately.

So how do you mean that?
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2013-02-26 14:29:03 EST (-0500)

This observation now has the name GOMPHIDIUS ROSEUS.
I want to add SUILLUS BOVINUS since both species are in the images.
How to do that?
How can I apply more species names into one observation name?

Hi Gerhard
By: Erlon (Herbert Baker)
2013-02-26 14:17:12 EST (-0500)

When you created the name Gomphidius roseas you added Suillus bovinus in the author citation of the former (I fixed that). You can add multiple names to this observation. You have to add S. bovinus separately.

What happened?
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2013-02-26 14:01:37 EST (-0500)

I clearly proposed Gomphidius roseus AND Suillus bovinus because both species are in this observation. Why isn’t it allowed to post two species at once? I do not get the sense behind this.
To call it “mixed collection” is not the right thing either. Or shall I post tow separate observations which I think is a waste of space?

Created: 2013-02-26 12:02:01 EST (-0500)
Last modified: 2013-11-18 12:21:46 EST (-0500)
Viewed: 38 times, last viewed: 2016-10-19 17:59:23 EDT (-0400)
Show Log