Observation 136547: Cyclocybe Velen.
When: 2013-06-16
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

11% (5)
Recognized by sight
-34% (3)
Recognized by sight: Since we are just guessing…
45% (5)
Recognized by sight
55% (1)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
Spore print
By: Eva Skific (Evica)
2014-06-11 22:08:26 CEST (+0200)

to me is dull-brown

Spore print is brown
By: Byrain
2014-06-11 17:25:17 CEST (+0200)

Look at the annulus.

spore print
By: Eva Skific (Evica)
2014-06-11 15:35:04 CEST (+0200)

is coming as soon as I find time to go pick the mushroom

Spore print?
By: walt sturgeon (Mycowalt)
2014-06-11 04:13:54 CEST (+0200)
same as
By: Eva Skific (Evica)
2014-06-11 00:49:12 CEST (+0200)

OBS 169092

I was
By: Byrain
2013-06-24 01:13:34 CEST (+0200)

going off the illustrations given, but now that I look at the description closer A. cylindrica has a stem described as “(25)40–110 × 4–16 mm” & “below annulus fibrillose to squamulose”.

By: Rocky Houghtby
2013-06-23 23:04:56 CEST (+0200)

Nauta has this to say of the annulus on A. cylindrica-

Annulus at 0.75–0.80 of height of stipe, 6–10 mm wide, descending, pendant to patent, rather thin, white to pale brown, with smooth to sometimes striate upperside; underside flocculose-squamu- lose

Without microscopy, this observation should probably be called “Agrocybe”. There are several European Agrocybe with big rings. God knows how many there are in NA.

By: Byrain
2013-06-23 18:23:33 CEST (+0200)

Agrocybe cylindrica even occur in the states? This looks even less like A. cylindrica than A. praecox with that large persistent annulus.

Because it doesn’t look like
By: Eric Smith (esmith)
2013-06-16 21:09:04 CEST (+0200)

what I call A. praecox; with the persistant, flaring annulus and the darker, umbillicate caps and they aren’t growing where I would expect to find A. praecox. I didn’t vote with a high level of confidence on anything. A. praecox cluster might be a better suggestion, as it might seem less arbitrary to some. ;)

Can you
By: Byrain
2013-06-16 20:49:54 CEST (+0200)

let me know what indicates A. praecox is wrong to you? How about A. acericola, is that even a natural “species”? I’m having a hard time understanding the concept behind it, do you know a good source?

As far as I can see, without more info it would be hard to confidently apply any of the proposed names as they are arbitrary. Please correct me if I’m wrong. :)

Am I missing something?
By: Eric Smith (esmith)
2013-06-16 20:40:43 CEST (+0200)

Is not “guessing” the whole point of suggesting names and voting with a confidence level?

Created: 2013-06-16 15:30:17 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2016-09-11 20:20:42 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 170 times, last viewed: 2016-10-28 00:29:40 CEST (+0200)
Show Log