Notes: also in WU?
This is now in Resupinatus but I still retain the genus. Besides many think poriaeforme is synonymous with urceolatum which I also thought up to this find.
The spores are smaller and the topsy-turvy cups are very small almost invisible to the naked eye. I first thought this to be some Corticiaceae.
|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||6.39||1||(Gerhard)|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
Created: 2013-06-21 23:50:37 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2013-06-21 23:50:42 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 32 times, last viewed: 2017-01-15 16:24:00 CET (+0100)