Observation 138031: Psathyrella (Fr.) Quél.
When: 2005-08-20
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

28% (1)
Recognized by sight
30% (2)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
Well i guess you read the email
By: Modified Hypothesis (Modified Hypothesis )
2013-06-30 00:10:03 CDT (-0400)

id go with Psathyrella over agaricales in my experience encountering both genus

By: Modified Hypothesis (Modified Hypothesis )
2013-06-29 22:22:20 CDT (-0400)

its a frame work if someone is in that area , if in the future someone finds something really similar so much so its clearly the same thing , then this can easily be updated. Tho yeah its kinda a scarp book to say. I don’t expect aneyone to really ID that cause its very no descriptive yet unique looking

Email sent with info from back then, i guess i knew the chant was what it was i just didn’t want to eat it

By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2013-06-29 20:50:58 CDT (-0400)

The site has no criteria for images aside from that of general decency and respect for other members. You are welcome to upload whatever images you like, though the chances of obtaining an ID decrease dramatically when little to no detail is discernible in the images provided. That said, it is entirely at your discretion whether or not to create more observations with images from this camera phone period you mentioned. If your goal is, say, to create a personal index of your collections from a particular area, then by all means continue uploading (bear in mind that observations need not necessarily even have corresponding images at all). If, however, you are interested in identifications, observations like this one will likely receive a very generic name proposal and be subsequently forgotten, part of the backlog. The choice is yours.

By: Modified Hypothesis (Modified Hypothesis )
2013-06-29 20:14:51 CDT (-0400)

So if you look at the date its from 2005 one could assume it was taken with a cell phone camera from 2005 you know those kinda that don’t have auto focus or any of that good stuff. i mean i could just delete all the pictures from that time period and not add anything because the quality isn’t good but i figure its worth documenting your a more prominent person on here tho so you think i should delete em all?

Created: 2013-06-29 18:30:34 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2013-06-30 00:10:21 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 31 times, last viewed: 2016-10-27 16:12:16 CDT (-0400)
Show Log