Observation 142389: Amanita amerirubescens Tulloss nom. prov.
When: 2013-08-11
No herbarium specimen

Notes: Do others agree on its identity?

Proposed Names

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
yes
By: Sam.Schaperow (SamSchaperow)
2013-08-12 10:33:48 CDT (-0500)

Understood.
Yes, i’ll do it.

I am agreeing with a NON-alba ID on the present observation.
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2013-08-12 09:26:57 CDT (-0500)

And I am referring to the similar blood red staining on both the alba and this observation.

I am happy that you are drying material from the alba observation.

And asked if you might be able to do the same for the present observation.

It’s the blood red staining that particularly interests me in both observations.

Very best,

Rod

Wait; what?
By: Sam.Schaperow (SamSchaperow)
2013-08-12 08:49:51 CDT (-0500)

Rod:

I’m confused. It appears you’re posting here about my other ob., the alba one (I just renamed it as alba). There I had said I was drying and asked your address, which you gave.

If you’re discussing this ob., I’d reply:
This observation we’re not calling alba, are we? Unless you think the pictures show more white than they should here, I can say it is a tan cap here. This was found in mixed woods.
Do you reference the other observation we’ve discussed? Or, do you want some of this?

Thank you.

Confusedly,

Sam

Yes.
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2013-08-12 08:22:25 CDT (-0500)

This material and your photograph of rubescens var. alba in the last few days both have shown an very intense red bruising that is unusual in my experience. Did you dry any of the material from this observation?

Very best,

Rod

Created: 2013-08-11 21:35:29 CDT (-0500)
Last modified: 2013-08-11 21:35:35 CDT (-0500)
Viewed: 40 times, last viewed: 2016-10-24 10:57:48 CDT (-0500)
Show Log