Observation 14252: Stropharia squamosa (Pers.) Quél.
When: 2008-11-14
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

40% (2)
Eye3 Eyes3
Used references: Aurora’s Mushrooms Demystified

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Older specimen?
By: Daniel B. Wheeler (Tuberale)
2008-11-16 23:30:06 AST (+0300)

Could that be because this is an older specimen, nearly planar (flat-capped)? And looking at the photo looking down at the cap, I can see some veil remnants still adhering to the rim, but not a lot. I think we have a hard time identifying this species. I remember something like it at the OMS show several years ago, and it ended up not being displayed because there was too much controversy surrounding it.

Well
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2008-11-16 21:19:36 AST (+0300)

It’s just that I haven’t imagined squamosa that pale and smooth and without a ring..

Why
By: Daniel B. Wheeler (Tuberale)
2008-11-16 20:52:29 AST (+0300)

According to Aurora, S. ambiqua has lots of veil remnants hanging to the edge of the cap rim (this doesn’t, but it is an older, more plane specimen); S. riparia has a stipe less than 1cm across. I think the stipe was more than 1cm across.

Stropharia sounds fine
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2008-11-16 15:34:38 AST (+0300)

but why not ambigua or riparia..?

Created: 2008-11-16 07:12:51 AST (+0300)
Last modified: 2008-11-16 07:12:51 AST (+0300)
Viewed: 91 times, last viewed: 2016-10-24 15:08:49 AST (+0300)