|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||6.08||1|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
Could that be because this is an older specimen, nearly planar (flat-capped)? And looking at the photo looking down at the cap, I can see some veil remnants still adhering to the rim, but not a lot. I think we have a hard time identifying this species. I remember something like it at the OMS show several years ago, and it ended up not being displayed because there was too much controversy surrounding it.
It’s just that I haven’t imagined squamosa that pale and smooth and without a ring..
According to Aurora, S. ambiqua has lots of veil remnants hanging to the edge of the cap rim (this doesn’t, but it is an older, more plane specimen); S. riparia has a stipe less than 1cm across. I think the stipe was more than 1cm across.
but why not ambigua or riparia..?
Created: 2008-11-16 05:12:51 CET (+0100)
Last modified: 2008-11-16 05:12:51 CET (+0100)
Viewed: 91 times, last viewed: 2016-10-24 14:08:49 CEST (+0200)