Observation 14276: Amanita sect. Vaginatae sensu Zhu L. Yang
When: 2008-11-12
No herbarium specimen

Notes: Growing in grassy knoll near pine

Proposed Names

76% (2)
Eye3
Recognized by sight
45% (2)
Recognized by sight: To make a more confident id, one would need to see the underside and volva more clearly, but based on the location and looks…Amanita pachycolea looks pretty safe.
55% (1)
Recognized by sight: small size, brown cap. lacks prominant umbo.
83% (1)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight: a member of section vaginatae fer sure.

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
no vaginata in North America!
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2008-11-18 16:16:27 CET (+0100)

…and the ones that we call vaginata group for lack of a better name are mostly gray, not brown. This mushroom could also be a constricta…you can’t ID amanitas to sp. w/out digging them up (well, maybe not the case for muscaria…)! Pachycolea has a very thick volva that extends well up the stipe and often stains orange-red; constricta has a pinched and flaring volva.
Both are common at SP.

A. pachycolea or A. vaginata
By: Daniel B. Wheeler (Tuberale)
2008-11-17 19:45:23 CET (+0100)

Without complete volva, difficult to say with certainty.

Created: 2008-11-17 02:41:34 CET (+0100)
Last modified: 2012-01-25 18:20:11 CET (+0100)
Viewed: 101 times, last viewed: 2016-10-26 00:51:55 CEST (+0200)
Show Log