Observation 143515: Sarcodon imbricatus (L.) P. Karst.
When: 2013-08-21
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

30% (6)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight: Look closer.
-3% (4)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
there seemed to be a real polarization of votes, is all…
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2013-09-22 20:34:43 CDT (-0400)

for no real reason that I could see.

Patrick added his comment re: the necklace containing actual Sarcodon back on the fifth. I just saw it today.

Not drama, just correcting an error.

Only reason
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2013-09-22 14:46:35 CDT (-0400)

is that I didn’t see the actual mushrooms at first.
No drama was intended, Debbie.

fabulous mushroom portrait…
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2013-09-22 14:19:18 CDT (-0400)

nice model, too. I can see why she won the contest, and this might just be enough of a reason to get ME to Telluride next year! I love creative minds. :)

Why so “funny” about a “non-fungal” designation, folks? When, say, our friend Erin models a porcini, without benefit of clever costuming, or even Christian, who proposed “non-fungal” for this multi-fungal sighting, models a porcini, it still gets called Boletus edulis.

Why the different treatment here?

This is merely a plus de ultra Sarcodon imbricatus photo.

Lighten up, people. Fungi can be fun, too, eh?

Britt B. will know
By: Patrick Harvey (pg_harvey)
2013-09-05 17:44:13 CDT (-0400)

She won the costume contest at Telluride — and by the way, those ARE S. imbricatus that she is wearing around her neck! Found her name — Claire DeLeo

pg
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2013-09-05 16:43:45 CDT (-0400)

do you know the person in the photo? she looks familiar…

Created: 2013-08-21 22:13:29 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2013-09-22 14:20:05 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 145 times, last viewed: 2016-09-09 22:15:38 CDT (-0400)
Show Log