Observation 144380: Clitocybe
When: 2013-09-01
No herbarium specimen

Images

363142
image.jpg
363143
image.jpg
363355
image.jpg
363356
image.jpg
363357
image.jpg
363358
image.jpg

Proposed Names

28% (1)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight
6% (2)
Eye3
Used references: Wikipedia ( sorry I have no other references…

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
smell and spores
By: Dr. Suzanne Carriere (CarriereS)
2013-09-02 19:41:42 CEST (+0200)

spores are white, no smell at all.

specimens
By: Dr. Suzanne Carriere (CarriereS)
2013-09-02 18:48:55 CEST (+0200)

could i send them somewhere.. would they be interest? thanks for the heads up on difficulties..

any odor to this mushroom, Suzanne?
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2013-09-02 18:45:05 CEST (+0200)

Did you do a spore print? If pinkish spores, this could also be a Lepista species.

Certainly it’s one of the saprobic fungi forming your fairy ring, and certainly they are Clitocybe-like in form.

As Byrain pointed out, not every mushroom can be IDed through a photograph, especially one of the fairly nondescript Clitocybe/Lepista species.

BTW, there is no such thing as too much data for those of us at home who are attempting these online IDs. So next time, do a full sensory account! We’ll all end up learning more about your finds.

Your find
By: Byrain
2013-09-02 18:23:06 CEST (+0200)

Looks much larger than C. rivulosa, I think you have something else. Clitocybe can be difficult to identify and notice that my proposal is only “Could be”, not a sign showing I am certain this is Clitocybe. :)

Clitocybe rivulosa
By: Dr. Suzanne Carriere (CarriereS)
2013-09-02 17:46:04 CEST (+0200)

proposed name..spores are white, and rings show very well.

Created: 2013-09-02 02:33:18 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2013-09-02 18:21:49 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 40 times, last viewed: 2015-03-04 04:38:30 CET (+0100)
Show Log