Observation 145858: Amanita Pers.
When: 2013-09-18
Who: _Matt_

Proposed Names

82% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Thanks for your response, Matt.
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2013-09-19 15:26:02 PDT (-0700)

Very best,

Rod

Summary:
By: _Matt_
2013-09-19 15:11:19 PDT (-0700)

This was because of the veil remnants on the cap. They didn’t resemeble the usual pattern but it didn;t really occur to me at the time that it might be because it’s immature. The cap is also one of the greener ones (by itself it wouldn’t have influenced my decision). Apart from that i was sure it was A. rubescens.

Comparing the two observations of rubescent taxa posted just now,…
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2013-09-18 15:52:07 PDT (-0700)

this one seems as though it will expand to be more gracile than the mushroom in the first observation. I noticed you didn’t classify this right away as rubescens. This suggests to me that you also detect some differences between the two collections.

Rod

Created: 2013-09-18 15:42:49 PDT (-0700)
Last modified: 2013-09-18 15:42:54 PDT (-0700)
Viewed: 18 times, last viewed: 2015-07-22 09:29:45 PDT (-0700)
Show Log