Observation 146399: Coprinopsis P. Karst.
When: 2013-09-24
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

23% (2)
Recognized by sight: Pictures of a single specimen with no collection or traces of a veil left, yea, gl getting this to genus let alone species…
29% (1)
Recognized by sight
-21% (2)
Recognized by sight: No veil
-38% (2)
Recognized by sight: No veil

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
Why so rude and condescending?
By: Tim Sage (T. Sage)
2013-09-25 18:34:00 CEST (+0200)

No need for that….

By: Byrain
2013-09-25 18:20:52 CEST (+0200)

How are you ruling out Parasola? Or Coprinellus sect. Setulosi? Both are without any veil. Or all the other Coprinopsis species? Passes for is not enough, you might as well call this Tom for all we know…you really should know better by now than to just apply arbitrary names that are most likely wrong.

They are the most common ink cap…..
By: Tim Sage (T. Sage)
2013-09-25 18:17:10 CEST (+0200)

In my neighborhood, I know them quite well. It is certainly Coprinopsis, but I have not done microscopy to 100% confirm C. lagopus.

This mushroom is what passes as C. lagopus in my locale.

Created: 2013-09-25 06:14:56 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2013-09-25 18:51:48 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 38 times, last viewed: 2016-10-28 01:07:23 CEST (+0200)
Show Log