|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||5.04||1||(mycotrope)|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
Yes, we have L. magnispora here, but it is a little different macroscopically and the spores are a different size and shape. Else explains this in post #80875. You also can check Breitenbach “Fungi of Switzerland” Vol. 4 and compare L. clypeolaria and Magnispora (as L. ventriosospora). My concept is that clypeolaria has more pallid scales on the cap, and the stem is a little less shaggy. Maybe Else can elaborate, or correct me.
Is there a particular reason that L. magnispora is not applied up in that area of WA?
I think if I found this here, I would use that name, but haven’t researched the differences
between our two areas well enough to know why usage might be different.
Created: 2013-10-18 03:46:03 EEST (+0300)
Last modified: 2013-10-18 18:01:08 EEST (+0300)
Viewed: 68 times, last viewed: 2017-06-17 01:19:52 EEST (+0300)