Observation 149028: Lepiota clypeolaria (Bull.) P. Kumm.
When: 2013-10-15
0 Sequences

Proposed Names

60% (2)
Eye3 Eyes3
Based on microscopic features: Spores 11-16(18) x 4-6µm

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
By: Drew Parker (mycotrope)
2013-10-17 21:59:23 PDT (-0700)

Yes, we have L. magnispora here, but it is a little different macroscopically and the spores are a different size and shape. Else explains this in post #80875. You also can check Breitenbach “Fungi of Switzerland” Vol. 4 and compare L. clypeolaria and Magnispora (as L. ventriosospora). My concept is that clypeolaria has more pallid scales on the cap, and the stem is a little less shaggy. Maybe Else can elaborate, or correct me.

By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2013-10-17 21:27:51 PDT (-0700)

Hi Drew,

Is there a particular reason that L. magnispora is not applied up in that area of WA?
I think if I found this here, I would use that name, but haven’t researched the differences
between our two areas well enough to know why usage might be different.


Created: 2013-10-17 17:46:03 PDT (-0700)
Last modified: 2013-10-18 08:01:08 PDT (-0700)
Viewed: 68 times, last viewed: 2017-06-16 15:19:52 PDT (-0700)
Show Log