Notes: Growing near conifers @ ~5000ft.
Single specimen with cap 8.0 cm across and a stubby stipe ~ 4 X 4 cm.
Spore print rusty and spores ~ 7.9-9.1 X 4.8-5.1 microns and slightly rough.
No strong odor and taste was mild.
Didn’t have my KOH with me before I dried it.
|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||0.00||0|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
Good points on the morphological considerations — with C. glaucopus though one quickly sees a rather inconsistent outside features, there usually is a small rimmed bulb, but not nearly mandatory as is the case with the calochroid clade where it is always present. I can show many photos. I could have easily seen something in the Variecolores group, but the spores there are large. Looking at the spores here, being that small, I see the glaucopus gr. Single fruitbodies are never optional to id, but I said I see glaucopus more than anything else.
I am not seeing a radially streaked, viscid cap (altho it is a bit shiny, no stuck debris, tho) and there is certainly no rimmed basal blub here.
What are the unifying features for “glaucopus group” designation?
I think this is in the C. glaucopus gr. C. ponderosus usually has that strong smell and the spores tend to be a bit longer.Dimitar
nice contrast with delicate purple gills.
Created: 2013-10-18 19:32:24 PDT (-0700)
Last modified: 2013-10-19 13:25:03 PDT (-0700)
Viewed: 42 times, last viewed: 2016-10-21 09:33:01 PDT (-0700)