Observation 150928: Gymnopilus P. Karst.
When: 2013-11-02
Collection location: Washington, USA [Click for map]
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

27% (1)
Recognized by sight
52% (3)
Recognized by sight
-17% (3)
Recognized by sight
-55% (1)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
By: lightworkerpeace (gsharpnolack)
2014-04-20 16:44:05 CDT (-0400)

For increased exposure I’m bumping this.

By: Richard and Danielle Kneal (bloodworm)
2013-11-04 11:50:15 CST (-0500)

thanks for your input…

keep an eye out for G. rufobrunneus and G. arenicola, which are said to grow directly from soil as well…

there have been a few “terrestrial” Gymnopilus species found in Florida this year as well…

very cool!!!

i REALLY wish gsharp collected these…
i haven’t been this upset since maynard failed to collect G. oregonensis a couple years back…

What I found here
By: Elsa (pinknailsgirl)
2013-11-04 11:37:02 CST (-0500)

is that the most G. appearing to grow on soil, are often growing in small pieces of wood (pine) or pine bark/litter.

By: Richard and Danielle Kneal (bloodworm)
2013-11-04 10:19:24 CST (-0500)

i really do not think they are Galerina…

Gymnopilus terrestris is an option…
which is said to grow from soil/humus under conifers.

the type was collected in Longmire, Washington in 1952.

By: lightworkerpeace (gsharpnolack)
2013-11-04 10:08:26 CST (-0500)

Hi. No, I didn’t. I felt that they were likely in the genus Galerina and had grown differently due to the weather. What Gymnopilus species would you consider?

By: Richard and Danielle Kneal (bloodworm)
2013-11-04 09:59:21 CST (-0500)

i don’t suppose you collected these…??

Created: 2013-11-02 18:16:41 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2015-10-04 14:39:43 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 67 times, last viewed: 2016-10-23 20:46:29 CDT (-0400)
Show Log