Observation 153715: Gymnopilus P. Karst.
When: 2013-11-25
No herbarium specimen
0 Sequences

Proposed Names

5% (3)
Recognized by sight: I have no idea what species they are, but Bloodworm suggested that they are pulchrifolius (which I’ve never heard of)
90% (2)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
By: maynardjameskeenan
2013-11-26 08:55:24 CET (+0100)

The yellow/orange and pinkish/reddish coloring of the lamellae and Pileus. These have no sign of a veil at all. at first I thought they were Gymnopilus penetrans until I noticed the discolored spots.

Which similarities
By: Rocky Houghtby
2013-11-26 07:31:44 CET (+0100)

do you see between your collection and G. braendlei, or the description for G. pulchrifolius?

By: maynardjameskeenan
2013-11-26 07:28:37 CET (+0100)

Yes, I do see a lot a similarities between that description and these Gymnopilus. I also see similarities with Gymnopilus braendlei sans the veil. I really have no clue what species these are, and I didn’t get much input from the shroomery besides from bloodworm. They had what appeared to be some signs of Psilocybin oxidation which got my attention. They pins were sort of a reddish orange color. The mycelium was very root-like.

By: Rocky Houghtby
2013-11-26 07:14:39 CET (+0100)

can now be found here-


Do you think that these mushrooms match the mushrooms in the description?

Created: 2013-11-26 06:22:00 CET (+0100)
Last modified: 2014-10-14 05:52:19 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 109 times, last viewed: 2017-06-17 22:57:33 CEST (+0200)
Show Log