Observation 153852: Clitocybe subconnexa Murrill
When: 2013-10-25
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

29% (1)
Recognized by sight
58% (1)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
I agree, Eva.
By: Dave W (Dave W)
2013-12-04 01:15:55 IST (+0530)

The clustering seems to favor a subconnexa ID. I have posted one obs as phyllophia, but I’m really not sure about the difference between the two types.
http://mushroomobserver.org/76994?q=1f8QR

thanks for the input
By: Eva Skific (Evica)
2013-12-04 01:04:40 IST (+0530)

Dave
mushroomexpert.com
say for C.subconnexa = growing scattered or, commonly sea, in clusters in leaf debris or conifer duff, appearing under hardwoods or conifers in a variety of diverse ecosystems.
Although it appears that there is only conifer debris on the ground, there were more maple and aspens around

I did not think that C. phylophilla is clusterd as much as is C. subconnexa.

Hi Eva.
By: Dave W (Dave W)
2013-12-03 09:38:42 IST (+0530)

I ran across the name Clitocybe phyllophila in Phillips a few years ago. Seems to me that C. subconnexa and C. phyllophila are similar. Spore print colors are each light, but not white. Reports I have read say that subconnexa is found under hardwoods.

Created: 2013-11-28 20:05:49 IST (+0530)
Last modified: 2013-12-04 01:02:45 IST (+0530)
Viewed: 54 times, last viewed: 2016-11-17 01:28:12 IST (+0530)
Show Log