|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||6.39||1||(Gerhard)|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
And thanks for confirming my suspicion :-)
Yes! Thank you! H. atramentosus has been confirmed by the finder.
The pics are a bit overexposed but not that much. This was found in a pristine spruce-beech-fir forest reservation. I can’t decide if it is calcareous or acidic because of the needle layer there. But overall I guess it is calcareous. I hadn’t had a closer look on this. A mycologist had ID’d it as camarophyllus. Would be very glad if it is atramentosus. If I do not forget I will mention that upon the next university visit.
these pictures caught my attention as something I don’t really recognize as H. camarophyllus. If they show true colours (with a slight bluish tint) – have you considered Hygrophorus atramentosus? I have never found it myself.
If it’s found on calcareous ground, it’s very likely atramentosus..
Created: 2013-12-26 15:14:40 CET (+0100)
Last modified: 2014-11-29 11:34:55 CET (+0100)
Viewed: 125 times, last viewed: 2016-10-27 09:51:53 CEST (+0200)