Observation 156409: Pholiotina Fayod

Proposed Names

59% (2)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Actually…
By: Byrain
2013-12-28 02:57:30 GMT (+0000)

I spoke too soon, make that 5 species… See observation 19885, obs 65857 (Can be annulate), obs 130970, here & I have one more which I will upload microscopy for soon(ish). And these are all European names, I’m not sure if they will last once they are subjected to DNA examination.

Haphazardly
By: Hunter hunter
2013-12-28 02:13:52 GMT (+0000)
Haphazardly would be my advice that these are an edible species. I was curious of the new names. Actually prolly new to me cause I’m not a complete know it all. Although I try. I bet I’m right though. Did you keep a type collection to study?
Pholiotina
By: Byrain
2013-12-28 01:46:37 GMT (+0000)

There are at least 4 different annulate Pholiotina species in CA, its not right to haphazardly call them all P. rugosa.

I don’t think
By: Randy Longnecker (Randy L.)
2013-12-28 01:45:42 GMT (+0000)

it’s proper to apply a species name until I get some microscopy done.

?
By: Hunter hunter
2013-12-28 01:16:02 GMT (+0000)

I’m a little confused. Can someone help me understand. I remember these as Pholiotina filaris. Then I thought they were renamed to Conocybe filaris. Am I to understand these are now Pholiotina rugosa? Am I correct or am I thinking of something else?

Created: 2013-12-28 00:28:31 GMT (+0000)
Last modified: 2013-12-28 01:45:37 GMT (+0000)
Viewed: 53 times, last viewed: 2017-04-04 06:53:05 BST (+0100)
Show Log