Observation 158584: Leucocoprinus Pat.
When: 2013-12-30
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

28% (1)
Eye3
Recognized by sight
37% (2)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2014-02-01 16:38:51 CET (+0100)

Else is far and away the authority to consult on a question like this, but in my personal experience, I find that red-staining in the lepiotacious fungi is a good potential character for Leucoagaricus, whereas an overall coprinoid shape and habit — clustered to caespitose (though sometimes solitary, as in L. fragilissimus), somewhat to extremely fragile, some degree of striation/plication/sulcation on the pileus — is indicative of Leucocoprinus. both necessarily possess free, white gills and white spores.

these “gists” are surely not without exceptions. hopefully Else can comment further.

Martin
By: Britney Ramsey (Riverdweller)
2014-01-28 16:35:03 CET (+0100)

I tool a look and saw only one labeled Leucoagaricus.
http://mushroomobserver.org/158725?q=1lZaV
I agree with that id

Britney
By: Martin Livezey (MLivezey)
2014-01-28 02:13:31 CET (+0100)

Have you seen the observations of Suse that have been identified as Leucoagaricus? They look to me as if they could just as well be Leucocoprinus. I don’t know either genera from first hand experience, but I am looking for white agaricus and white coprinus and neither seem to be very good guidelines. What do you think of the observations marked Leucoagaricus? Do you agree?

Created: 2014-01-25 19:43:30 CET (+0100)
Last modified: 2014-01-27 23:18:37 CET (+0100)
Viewed: 51 times, last viewed: 2015-01-20 20:33:23 CET (+0100)
Show Log