Observation 158842: Inflatostereum glabrum (Lév.) D.A. Reid
When: 2014-01-05
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

-9% (3)
Recognized by sight
-6% (2)
Used references: SWAMPE 58, 2008; Swampelivet pa aekvator, Thomas Laessoe & Jens H. Petersen (Laedersvampe)
http://www.mycokey.com/Ecuador/LaessoPetersen2008.pdf
28% (1)
Recognized by sight
57% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight: This ID was provided by a mycologist specialized in aphyllophoraceous fungi in the Neotropics on “picture only basis”

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
cool
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2015-06-14 03:07:11 PDT (-0700)

nice to have a name for this, however tentative

Many thanks
By: Susanne Sourell (suse)
2015-06-05 06:29:04 PDT (-0700)

… to Dr. Tatiana Gibertoni from Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) for the ID.

Just for DOC; MYCOBANK.
By: GALL Alain (GALLA-TAHITI)
2014-09-04 16:08:38 PDT (-0700)
Danny
By: Susanne Sourell (suse)
2014-09-04 13:41:33 PDT (-0700)

…so far I have not asked for a permission to include the name with the ID on MO ….

Side note:
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2014-09-04 13:27:32 PDT (-0700)

who is this mycologist you reference in your name proposal?

Hm..
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2014-09-04 13:24:54 PDT (-0700)

Those should be changed, at least those for which familial affinity is known and agreed upon. I’d do it myself, if I weren’t commenting from my phone on the way to work :)

Lower Taxa
By: Susanne Sourell (suse)
2014-09-04 13:16:46 PDT (-0700)

under Stereaceae s.l. “sensu Mushroom Observer”: http://mushroomobserver.org/name/index_name?q=2AZCH

sensu lato names
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2014-09-04 12:58:44 PDT (-0700)

refer to body forms, not monophyletic assemblages. Stereaceae was once used to refer to all relexed/effused-reflexed basidiomycetes, just as Agaricales once contained all agarics.

because Inflatostereum …
By: Susanne Sourell (suse)
2014-09-04 11:29:04 PDT (-0700)
is in the Family Phanerochaetaceae and Order Polyporales.
if truly without pores
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2014-09-04 11:03:35 PDT (-0700)

why the vote against Stereaceae sensu lato?

Martin: Might be
By: Susanne Sourell (suse)
2014-03-01 10:38:45 PST (-0800)

I agree that this observation and the one from New Zealand look completely different. The fungi observed by myself have grown on wood, but the ones in NZ have grown on ground. I have chosen the name Stereopsis hiscens because my pictures are almost identical to the ones depicted in “Fungi of Ecuador” SWAMPE 58 on page 9 of 27 of the cited pdf document. So far only a working title. I have no literature to date.

Regarding picture 3 these seem to be telephodes. I assume this is another example of a rhizoid forming fungus from the neotropics. See also http://mushroomobserver.org/158663?q=1pCKu

Posted some more pics for you …

Does not look like
By: Martin Livezey (MLivezey)
2014-02-28 13:39:18 PST (-0800)

http://hiddenforest.co.nz/...

Is fungi in photo 3 the same as in the two above?

Created: 2014-01-29 09:59:17 PST (-0800)
Last modified: 2014-09-04 13:17:32 PDT (-0700)
Viewed: 207 times, last viewed: 2016-10-27 10:25:40 PDT (-0700)
Show Log