Observation 161621: Fungi Bartl.
When: 2014-03-12
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

1% (2)
Eye3
Based on microscopic features
81% (1)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight: I can’t see conidiaphores at all in these photos, much less ones with dark conidial heads of the A. niger group.
57% (1)
Recognized by sight: new name for Zygomycota, apparently

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Guess not
By: Hunter hunter
2014-03-19 19:56:29 CET (+0100)
I still haven’t gotten a camera or attachment for my scope. Tossed this specimen a couple days ago. Gonna start taking I phone shots through the eye piece more often at least. Idk.
can we see the microscopic feature?
By: Jonathan M
2014-03-19 16:08:14 CET (+0100)

the fungus in this picture is more reminescent of a rhizopus (that have a bit of a similar microscopy as aspergillus).

Created: 2014-03-19 06:44:49 CET (+0100)
Last modified: 2017-07-06 00:42:48 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 55 times, last viewed: 2017-07-11 01:59:36 CEST (+0200)
Show Log