Observation 163184: Exidia recisa (Ditmar) Fr.
When: 2014-04-08
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

86% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight
85% (1)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
By: Erlon (Herbert Baker)
2014-04-10 14:58:14 CDT (-0400)

Sorry, I misunderstood the question! I have not done any research on the differences and I did not know that they were different. Do we have any DNA from north America we can compare to the European species? What are the morphological differences?

By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2014-04-10 13:05:59 CDT (-0400)

I have been wondering too, why these are always called Exidia recisa. Maybe my fault..? Exidia recisa is the closest european lookalike – but not a perfect match.
I can’t find any sequenced material from North America close to it either..

By: Erlon (Herbert Baker)
2014-04-10 12:32:26 CDT (-0400)

because that is the focus of this observation. Should have I removed the other fungi from the log before posting under that name?

By: Richard and Danielle Kneal (bloodworm)
2014-04-09 20:39:51 CDT (-0400)

why are we calling all of these obs. Exidia recisa?

Created: 2014-04-09 20:15:17 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2014-04-10 11:39:58 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 53 times, last viewed: 2016-10-26 12:34:58 CDT (-0400)
Show Log