Observation 168921: Cantharellus tenuithrix Buyck & V. Hofst.
When: 2014-06-12

Notes: Found in the Big Sandy Creek Unit of the Big Thicket National Preserve.
Caps up to 6.4 cm across.
“Gills” and stipe white.
Spores ~ 8.2-10.0 X 4.2-5.0 microns, elongate to oblong, many reniform.
Q(range) = 1.76-2.14. Q(ave) = 1.96
These seemed to match the description for C. phasmatis pretty closely. The only hitch is while I didn’t get a strong spore print, they appeared to be whitish rather than “salmon pink”.

Proposed Names

9% (2)
Used references: Matthew Foltz Master’s Thesis

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
No, I don’t remember any bruising but
By: Ron Pastorino (Ronpast)
2016-04-15 06:15:46 CEST (+0200)

I don’t recall looking for that characteristic.
I downgraded my vote to reflect the more popular choice.

By: Shawn Fischer (Fischbones)
2016-04-15 06:01:55 CEST (+0200)

Did you notice any bruising on the Hymenium when cut?

Patrick….sorry I’ve taken so long to respond.
By: Ron Pastorino (Ronpast)
2015-02-28 02:21:23 CET (+0100)

Just got back from a short trip and needed to check my notes.
Looks like I was mostly influenced by the white hymenium on these which seems to be the most defining characteristic of C. phasmatis. Foltz and Volk call them the “Ghost Chanterelle”. However, due to where I found them, I don’t disagree that C. tenuithrix could be a valid ID also.

Why not Cantharellus tenuithrix
By: Patrick R. Leacock (MycoGuide)
2015-02-24 07:01:46 CET (+0100)

Why aren’t you calling this one Cantharellus tenuithrix?

Created: 2014-07-02 19:14:57 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2016-04-15 06:12:47 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 124 times, last viewed: 2016-10-23 23:16:25 CEST (+0200)
Show Log