Observation 185404: Polysporina simplex (Davies) Vězda

Proposed Names

31% (2)
Recognized by sight
61% (2)
Eye3 Eyes3
Used references: Jason Hollinger ID

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
Tough group!
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2016-01-25 19:08:50 PST (-0800)

Yeah, I think I didn’t remember that some Sarcogyne have carbonized margins when I wrote my comment below. Sonoran Flora covers most of the species, at least the common widespread ones, so it should be a good reference.

Scrap that – I guess it’s supposed to have cracked rim?
By: Andrew Khitsun (Andrew)
2016-01-25 17:07:57 PST (-0800)

On the other hand, I am reading that S.regularis can be carbonized too – the only one non-carbonized is S. privigna. I am reading mostly from CNALH, where the info comes from Sonoran Flora, it seems.

Sarcogyne clavus is said to be carbonised?
By: Andrew Khitsun (Andrew)
2016-01-25 16:52:39 PST (-0800)

For some reason I never see that species being discussed. This particular specimen I’d rule out S.privigna just because apothecia are bigger here. But don’t know anything about S.clavus

Not very confident…
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2015-01-25 07:51:56 PST (-0800)

Polysporina is first and foremost defined by roughened umbonate or gyrose apothecia… this clearly has smooth round apothecia. But in section, I find the exciple to be fully carbonized and the epihymenium to be very dark, too. (Hymenium ~120µm deep; spores many per ascus, ~4-5×2-2.5µm.) The carbonized exciple should rule out Sarcogyne, perhaps more reliably than the lack of textured apothecia would otherwise rule out Polysporina.

Created: 2014-10-24 16:15:46 PDT (-0700)
Last modified: 2015-12-16 12:06:19 PST (-0800)
Viewed: 97 times, last viewed: 2016-10-28 00:15:01 PDT (-0700)
Show Log