Observation 189012: Laccaria trullisata group
When: 2014-11-01
No herbarium specimen

Notes: Growing beside road under Myrtaceae/Acacia sp.

Andean cloud forest located between 2500 and 2950 m.a.s.l.

Notable tree spp.:

Roble (Quercus humboldtii)
Uvito de Monte (Cavendishia pubescens)
Chilco colorado (Escallonia myrtilloides)
Sietecueros (Tibouchina lepidota)
Canelo de Páramo (Drimys Granadensis)
Carate (Vismia baccifera)
Yarumo (Cecropia peltata)
Drago (Croton urucurana)
Chagualo (Clusia multiflora)
Carbonero (Calliandra haematocephala)
Schefflera sp.
Encenillo (Weinmannia tomentosa)
Arrayán (Myrcia cucullata)
Manzano De Monte (Billia rosea)

Collected for the Basidiomycete Course of the 8th Congresso Latinoamericano de Micologia.

Proposed Names

1% (3)
Eye3 Eyes3
Used references: Dr. Gregory Mueller

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
and fyi
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2014-11-19 13:48:59 PST (-0800)

several of these have photos coming down the pipe. i decided to do the species list all at once for convenience’s sake.

By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2014-11-19 12:41:39 PST (-0800)

this is a dead end topic with you. That you have turned on me and my observations after going out of my way to moderate between opposing viewpoints on this issue — including yours, however antagonistic they may be — is my personal last straw. if you refuse to see any merit in the unequivocally meritorious act of recording a fungal what, where and when without a photographic “guarantee,” as if such a thing existed, i suggest you do so privately. this dead horse is turning into glue with all the beatings its been dealt lately.

By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2014-11-19 10:34:40 PST (-0800)

they’re not useless, and I don’t find them disruptive.
Even if they were, you were not guaranteed an undisrupted experience by anyone associated with this site. What privilege are you levying here?

I also think it’s odd that you ask people to refrain from insulting you (a reasonable request) when you seem so ready to insult people’s efforts to add data. Calling them “spam” “useless” really does sting when you are in fact exerting many years of learning and volunteering time and data to this site.

By any account, your antagonistic comments are much more disruptive and spammy than anything else I’ve seen on the site recently.

If you want to make this site better, there are lots of ways to do it, and none of them involve making the experience of this site worse for people like Danny, who is clearly a valuable contributor.

Can you stop spamming the site with these?
By: Byrain
2014-11-19 06:40:42 PST (-0800)

They’re not only useless, they are disruptive.

Created: 2014-11-18 23:32:05 PST (-0800)
Last modified: 2014-11-19 06:40:02 PST (-0800)
Viewed: 54 times, last viewed: 2016-10-28 07:52:27 PDT (-0700)
Show Log