Observation 193290: Lecidea cyrtidia Tuck.

Proposed Names

2% (2)
Recognized by sight
-28% (1)
Recognized by sight: just because it’s fun to guess at these things sometimes…
69% (1)
Recognized by sight
Based on microscopic features: Dark brown hypothecium

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
Deleted Rinodina
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2018-04-17 11:32:18 CDT (-0400)

Sorry about that. The idea was to keep even the incorrect ids on the priniciple that one could some day search for things which were mistaken for Rinodina bischoffii. That is, superficially similar to R. bischoffii, but which turned out to be something else. That could indeed be a useful search. But since it was just a mistake this time, it makes sense to delete it.

Not Rinodina!
By: Jim Bennett (Lichenman)
2018-04-17 11:19:23 CDT (-0400)

I originally gave this specimen the Rinodina name not because of the specimen but because I thought this was the Cassville Bluffs record, but it wasn’t. So please ignore the Rinodina name in the list. I tried destroying it but MO wouldn’t let me saying it had strong support from someone but I don’t know what that means. I can’t see anyone’s support for it. This specimen is a Lecidea, not a Rinodina. There is a Rinodina from Cassvile but it’s another record.

Created: 2014-12-12 20:53:46 CST (-0500)
Last modified: 2018-04-17 11:32:20 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 72 times, last viewed: 2018-04-21 11:07:25 CDT (-0400)
Show Log