Observation 193791: Panaeolus cinctulus (Bolton) Britzelm.
When: 2014-12-15
No herbarium specimen

Notes: There seems to be a bluing at the lower part of the stipes especially on the very young specimens.

Images

493308
493309
493310
493321
493528
The spores of these fungi at 1000X magnification.
493529
The spores of these fungi at 1000X magnification.
493530
The spores of these fungi at 1000X magnification.
493715
The spores of these fungi at 1000X magnification.
494345
These fungi were growing from the same deposit on 12/20/2014.
494346
These fungi were growing from the same deposit on 12/20/2014.
494347
These fungi were growing from the same deposit on 12/20/2014.
495526
Image taken on 12/22/2014.
495527
Image taken on 12/24/2014.
495528
Image taken on 12/24/2014.
495529
Image taken on 12/24/2014.
495530
Image taken on 12/22/2014 from a second location.
495831
Image taken on 12/24/2014.
495832
Image taken on 12/26/2014.

Proposed Names

Tao
50% (3)
Recognized by sight
10% (3)
Recognized by sight
54% (3)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight: Thick stipes, blue staining on stem base

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
You keep adding…
By: Byrain
2014-12-27 08:52:30 PST (-0800)

images of what appears to be P. papillionaceus to this observation… Panaeolus cinctulus and its lookalikes do not have veil. It might be helpful to only upload images of from one date/fruiting to a single observation.

Veil?
By: Byrain
2014-12-21 09:59:02 PST (-0800)

So that is not veil? On second thought, the spores don’t seem like the papilionaceus type.

Tao, cheilocystidia? Spore sizes? Sulphidia?

Created: 2014-12-15 18:02:15 PST (-0800)
Last modified: 2014-12-27 09:43:15 PST (-0800)
Viewed: 197 times, last viewed: 2016-11-27 17:09:36 PST (-0800)
Show Log