Observation 194788: Tubaria furfuracea group

Proposed Names

86% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
Sorry, no better suggestions
By: Byrain
2014-12-27 18:44:55 CET (+0100)

That is why I asked, all the Tubaria keys I have seen haven’t been very useful. I have just been using Tubaria since I do not really understand what characteristics would include/exclude T. furfuraceae. From personal experience, some collections seem to have more or less veil, different pileus textures, and are smaller or larger. I have seen some unusual structures from the few collections I have scoped (img 199722), but then again I don’t have any useful literature to compare to…

features that would make it not in this group
By: Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
2014-12-27 18:19:38 CET (+0100)

“Group” on MO isn’t a formal term (C. Schwarz, personal communication), so something like

characters laying significantly outside the range of collections agreed to be T. furfuracea, or a cryptically distinct relative

I hope/think that “group” doesn’t demand monophyly.

Regardless of what the obs should be called now, other species suggestions?

Tubaria furfuracea group?
By: Byrain
2014-12-27 16:11:54 CET (+0100)

What makes this the T. furfuraceae group? What features would make it not in this group? Or is it just because its a Tubaria?

Created: 2014-12-27 10:40:21 CET (+0100)
Last modified: 2015-01-10 00:15:24 CET (+0100)
Viewed: 36 times, last viewed: 2017-06-19 23:28:51 CEST (+0200)
Show Log