Notes: in leaf litter under Juniperus monosperma
|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||4.44||1||(Disciseda)|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
i come across erroneous deprecations and synonymizations frequently. a consequence of anyone being able to change names at will.
MO is saying that G. schmidelii has been depreciated in favor of G. nanum. By what authority? Sunhede (1989) in “Geastraceae” says the opposite. Index Fungorum shows schmidelii as valid.
This from MycoBank: Geastrum schmidelii Vittad., Monogr. Lycoperd.: 13 (1842, as Geaster). Geastrum nanum Pers., J. Bot. (Morot) 2: 27 (1809, nom. illegit.).
Created: 2015-02-01 15:55:03 CST (-0500)
Last modified: 2015-02-01 15:55:07 CST (-0500)
Viewed: 46 times, last viewed: 2017-02-13 18:41:23 CST (-0500)