Observation 199675: Microglossum Gillet
When: 2015-01-07
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

52% (3)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight
-28% (1)
Recognized by sight
0% (2)
Recognized by sight
46% (2)
Recognized by sight: definitely something to confirm with micro +/- DNA, but let the proposal stand as a maybe for now
Used references: zaca’s sharp eye and excellent link

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
Thanks, Danny and Sr. Iglesias
By: Susanne Sourell (suse)
2015-03-07 14:18:09 EET (+0200)

… for your feedback. It is much appreciated.

Sr. Iglesias’ response
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2015-03-07 04:32:36 EET (+0200)

Hola Danny, sí, es posible que se trate de M. cyanobasis, haría falta ver algo de microscopía. Te adjunto el artículo que publicamos sobre esta especie en la revista de micología Errotari en 2013.


author emailed
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2015-03-07 02:01:36 EET (+0200)

interested to hear what he says

You are welcome, Susanne and Danny.
By: zaca
2015-03-06 20:25:31 EET (+0200)

It will be a long shot if this reveals to be M. cyanobasis. This species was only described in 2013, based on material from Spain. I’m very curious about the end of this story!

Zaca & Danny
By: Susanne Sourell (suse)
2015-03-06 20:15:20 EET (+0200)

Thanks so much! M. cyanobasis is indeed close enough to consider. Microscopy should allow further insight.

By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2015-03-06 02:23:22 EET (+0200)

that certainly looks close enough to consider Microglossum a very good possibility. thanks for the excellent link zaca.

Maybe Microglossum cyanobasis also exists in the “other planet”!
By: zaca
2015-03-06 01:22:04 EET (+0200)
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2015-03-06 01:10:52 EET (+0200)

that’s weird.

Created: 2015-02-24 22:09:05 EET (+0200)
Last modified: 2015-03-07 14:27:44 EET (+0200)
Viewed: 121 times, last viewed: 2017-02-20 11:05:25 EET (+0200)
Show Log