Observation 202123: Rhodophana nitellina (Fr.) Papetti
When: 2015-03-30

Notes: Growing on the ground, possibly on buried wood or woody debris, in mixed woods.
Caps up to 3 cm across. Whitish particulates on cap probably from environment as most of what I found had the same material on caps.
Cap somewhat radially appressed fibrillose.
Odor fairly strong, perhaps fruity.
Spore print thin but colored, light orangy. Spores not amyloid or dextrinoid.
Spores ~ 7.4-9.5 X 4.0-5.2 microns, elongate lacrymoid, and sl bumpy.
Did not see any gill cystidia.
Initially thought they might be Gymnopus nivalis but stem is too tapered and odor and spores not quite right.

Proposed Names

44% (2)
Recognized by sight
62% (4)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight
28% (1)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
maybe…
By: Richard and Danielle Kneal (bloodworm)
2015-04-01 06:33:40 CEST (+0200)

the description needs to change??

has any molecular work been done on this “group?”

Funny how
By: Noah Siegel (Noah)
2015-04-01 06:03:39 CEST (+0200)

Tom’s comment changed between reading it and posting :P

I think
By: Noah Siegel (Noah)
2015-04-01 06:02:19 CEST (+0200)

Rhodophana lacks cystidia

No cystidia?
By: Tom Bruns (pogon)
2015-04-01 05:54:12 CEST (+0200)

should have abundant cystidia, kind of sharp and thick-walled if I remember correctly

funny, the name changed from Tricholomopsis while I writing the above. I withdraw the cystidia prediction.

“I think Noah is correct.”
By: Noah Siegel (Noah)
2015-04-01 05:52:21 CEST (+0200)

I think so too….

Now, how many species going by this name in CA? that remains to be seen.

post…
By: Richard and Danielle Kneal (bloodworm)
2015-04-01 05:48:04 CEST (+0200)

more micro…

and the spores in H20…

a print would even help here.

also…
By: Richard and Danielle Kneal (bloodworm)
2015-04-01 05:45:42 CEST (+0200)

“translucent-striate…”

not quite.

As I said in my notes
By: Ron Pastorino (Ronpast)
2015-04-01 05:45:01 CEST (+0200)

the whitish particulates on the cap seemed to come from some kind of pollen or other environmental contaminant as everything I was finding had the same material on them.
There is also a description on Mykoweb. Everything pretty much fits, at least for what we have been calling these on the west coast.

glabrous pileus…??
By: Richard and Danielle Kneal (bloodworm)
2015-04-01 05:28:20 CEST (+0200)

i didnt write the desctiption, nor do i live in cali and i have also never seen the species…

but, that is what the description for Rhodophana nitellina says…

just sayin’. ;)

if Noah has some other information to share…that’d be cool.

I think Noah is correct.
By: Ron Pastorino (Ronpast)
2015-04-01 05:25:50 CEST (+0200)

They match the notes in Dennis Desjardin’s “Spring Fungi of the Sierra Nevada” and Dimitar’s notes in Mushroom Hobby.

Created: 2015-04-01 05:06:42 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2015-04-01 06:55:13 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 113 times, last viewed: 2016-05-31 23:16:02 CEST (+0200)
Show Log