Observation 20617: Tylopilus P. Karst.
When: 2008-12-15
No herbarium specimen

Notes:

[admin – Sat Aug 14 02:00:11 +0000 2010]: Changed location name from ‘Eastern Transvaal , South Africa’ to ‘Eastern Transvaal, South Africa’

Proposed Names

1% (3)
Eye3
Recognized by sight
Used references: VAN DER WESTHUIZEN, G.C.A. & EICKER, A. 1994. A Field Guide to the Mushrooms of Southern Africa. Cape Town: Struik Publishers (Pty) Ltd
43% (3)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight
28% (1)
Eye3
Used references: G.C.A VAN DER WESTHUIZEN & ALBERT EICKER
FIELD GUIDE MUSHROOMS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Top Pic Looks Like old specimens
By: Charles Seltenright Sr (Shroomin Yooper)
2011-03-16 19:28:13 CST (-0500)

They look spongy and rotten to me.The bottom looks like an Edulis to me.My Books dont have anything on South Africa.So I couldnt say for sure either way.

Phlebopus?
By: else
2011-03-16 15:34:22 CST (-0500)

Couldn’t it be a Phlebopus species – these are non-mycorrhizal which seems to fit your habitat (in grass) – unless there were mycorrhiza-forming trees around.

Hmmmm!?
By: Glen van Niekerk (primordius)
2009-04-28 13:32:11 CDT (-0400)

Thank you for all of the comments!
The specimen(s)were realy old and it might have confused cetain people.
You really have an acute sense of vision!

These mushrooms were collected under oak trees and therefore I would like to
suggest maybe Boletus aetivalis…?

The other species, as far as I can determine, do not occur in SA.

Would go for
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2009-04-28 06:15:22 CDT (-0400)

Boletus pinophilus too

Wrong colour
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2009-04-28 03:12:00 CDT (-0400)

Too much "sky"blue in the picture, I think the true colour is more like dark reddish brown..

I’ve looked for information about the South African “Boletus edulis”, and that was quite interesting. I found pictures of large harvests, and most of them had surprisingly pale caps, but that’s probably because they have been picked while they still were hidden in the duff under the pines. Another thing I noticed, was that the surface of the tubes was quickly darkening. That, and the fact that they were introduced to South Africa with pine plants, makes it most likely to be Boletus pinophilus. And that’s what I see in this link too:
http://www.ctctimber.co.za/...

I’m not sure what this observation shows though, not enough details in the picture. It might well be Boletus edulis sensu lato. That name is commonly used when they are for sale, and includes pinophilus, aereus, reticulatus and unnamed varieties among others (like the californian one for example).

if that purple color is true, it can’t possibly be edulis…
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2009-04-27 22:12:47 CDT (-0400)

but Tylopilus is another sort of bolete.

Created: 2009-04-26 15:35:32 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2011-03-17 06:25:47 CST (-0500)
Viewed: 279 times, last viewed: 2016-10-24 23:44:30 CDT (-0400)
Show Log