Observation 206539: Boletaceae Chevall.
When: 2015-06-13
No herbarium specimen

Images

527746
06-13-15iPhone5-WK-BK 006.JPG
527747
06-13-15iPhone5-WK-BK 010.JPG
527748
06-13-15iPhone5-WK-BK 011.JPG
527749
06-13-15iPhone5-WK-BK 014.JPG
527750
06-13-15iPhone5-WK-BK 015.JPG

Proposed Names

57% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight
28% (1)
Recognized by sight: Context in sectioned cap looks whitish, but this may be due to the yellow not showing up very well in the photo. Many of my own bicolor photos fail to show the yellow of the context.

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
I see some bluing on the cap context in the one photo.
By: Dave W (Dave W)
2015-06-14 17:42:12 CDT (-0400)

Didn’t notice that previously. I agree, this casts doubt upon the bicolor proposal. But like you say, IG, a small amount of bluing on the context…?

I’ll look through my own bicolor records later tonight. Most (if not all) of my bicolor collections have lacked the contextual bluing.

Staining
By: I. G. Safonov (IGSafonov)
2015-06-14 09:39:12 CDT (-0400)

I think there is a bit too much homogenous bluing on context for B. bicolor, but we know that feature is variable.

Created: 2015-06-13 23:51:56 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2015-06-14 17:42:29 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 49 times, last viewed: 2016-11-18 17:47:57 CST (-0500)
Show Log