Observation 207370: Hygrocybe subsect. Hygrocybe
When: 2015-06-20
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

50% (5)
Recognized by sight
34% (5)
Eye3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
H. singeri group
By: Phil (gunchky)
2016-06-05 19:35:19 CEST (+0200)

Has been deprecated to H. subsection hygrocybe.

Who
By: Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
2015-06-25 01:58:17 CEST (+0200)

anonymously voted against this being closely related to H. singeri?

The stem
By: Ann B. (Ann F. Berger)
2015-06-24 22:12:20 CEST (+0200)

is slippery, though not slimy, as it leaves no residue or stickiness on fingers. The cap became more sticky as it got drier.

I’m sure you have better resources
By: Terri Clements/Donna Fulton (pinonbistro)
2015-06-23 22:26:37 CEST (+0200)

than I do and I guess it may depend on whether you’re a splitter or not according to Arora. All of my references make a distinction between the two species based in part on sliminess of the stem and distribution.

Stem sliminess isn’t actually a great ID trait for these…
By: Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
2015-06-23 18:50:29 CEST (+0200)

but I don’t remember the source for that.

(Anyway, H. conica is in the singeri group…)

Was stem slimy?
By: Terri Clements/Donna Fulton (pinonbistro)
2015-06-23 15:47:04 CEST (+0200)

I think blackening longitudinally striated stem is true also of H. conica. Stem of H. singeri is slimy. Also, from what I’ve read the latter is a west coast species to upper great lakes while the former is widespread in NA.

Terri

Species suggestion?
By: Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
2015-06-23 03:47:12 CEST (+0200)

The stems have blackening striations.

Created: 2015-06-22 23:37:50 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2016-06-05 19:36:02 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 122 times, last viewed: 2017-02-20 01:35:15 CET (+0100)
Show Log