Observation 208002: Boletaceae Chevall.
When: 2015-06-27
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

28% (1)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight: possibly related to B. hortonii & B. subglabripes

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
John,
By: I. G. Safonov (IGSafonov)
2015-06-30 08:13:40 EEST (+0300)

The mushrooms appear to be waterlogged, and that distorts the caps. At the same time I am surprised these are so fresh and bug-free inside.
In my experience, the southern form of B. subglabripes has more red on the stipe. Also, since the species are related to the leccinums, their appearance should be more graceful, and your look more “stout”. I notice lack of gap between the stipe and tubes, but perhaps that feature is variable.

inside and out side color
By: John Plischke (John Plischke)
2015-06-30 08:04:18 EEST (+0300)

the outside of the young ones seem to have some sort of whitish see through coating on them and a few of the older ones flesh becomes reddish. I agree it looks like the photo and that it seems to fit the southern form.

Walter,
By: I. G. Safonov (IGSafonov)
2015-06-29 08:21:23 EEST (+0300)

139311 does look a bit like B. subglabripes (whatever genus it’s in now).
I see some bluing on cap context of 109280.

Dave,
By: I. G. Safonov (IGSafonov)
2015-06-29 08:10:27 EEST (+0300)

I see some furfuraceous texture on the upper stipe of the fb on extreme left.

Second photo
By: walt sturgeon (Mycowalt)
2015-06-29 03:23:25 EEST (+0300)

Back row. Note “plush look”
http://mushroomobserver.org/109280?q=2bLOT

Same as?
By: walt sturgeon (Mycowalt)
2015-06-29 03:23:12 EEST (+0300)

http://mushroomobserver.org/139311?q=2bLNe

Southern “form” of B. subglabripes?

Caught my eye…
By: Dave W (Dave W)
2015-06-29 03:17:48 EEST (+0300)

I have found subglabripes with wrinkled/pitted cap surface. BRB mention “reddish brown” as potential cap color for the “southern” version of subglabripes. But I don’t see the small raised dots on the stipe that I’d expect with this species. Stipe also seems rather pale for this species.

ID to species
By: I. G. Safonov (IGSafonov)
2015-06-28 07:29:11 EEST (+0300)

I still think these are morphologically related to hortonii & subglabripes.

John,
By: I. G. Safonov (IGSafonov)
2015-06-28 07:23:47 EEST (+0300)

I surely understand your excitement, and finding these would make my day, too! Congrats! I would save time poring over the literature and just ask Alan or Noah.

adding more photos and
By: John Plischke (John Plischke)
2015-06-28 07:16:50 EEST (+0300)

I took over 20 photos of it and have a large collection.

The caps were really red and really wavy and somewhat dimpled. I never saw anything like it. I spent 40 minutes taking the photos. I agree I don’t think they are hortonii, I have never seen it red. I spent the last hour with the bolete book and still can’t find it. It made my day when I found these. I really like finding something different looking. I will keep looking for something that fits.

No bruising or staining of any kind

Will this material be preserved & sequenced?
By: I. G. Safonov (IGSafonov)
2015-06-28 07:13:36 EEST (+0300)
Wow, just wow!
By: I. G. Safonov (IGSafonov)
2015-06-28 07:09:52 EEST (+0300)

I don’t think these are B. hortonii, but I don’t have better ideas. Certainly not something I’ve ever seen!

no bruising under oak
By: John Plischke (John Plischke)
2015-06-28 07:06:11 EEST (+0300)

no bruising under oak, there were 2 oaks in the middle of a field no other trees

Created: 2015-06-28 07:05:00 EEST (+0300)
Last modified: 2015-06-28 07:30:07 EEST (+0300)
Viewed: 101 times, last viewed: 2016-10-23 07:57:38 EEST (+0300)
Show Log